2007
DOI: 10.1137/s0040585x97982402
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some Remarks on an Interpolation Problem of A. M. Yaglom

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the formulation of the result as well as the proof given there were somewhat imprecise or even misleading and Theorem 2.2 removes this inaccuracy. Moreover, [6] was written ignoring Pourahmadi's paper [14]. Here we point out the interrelations between Pourahmadi's results and ours.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, the formulation of the result as well as the proof given there were somewhat imprecise or even misleading and Theorem 2.2 removes this inaccuracy. Moreover, [6] was written ignoring Pourahmadi's paper [14]. Here we point out the interrelations between Pourahmadi's results and ours.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Section 5 deals with the description of the spectral measure of a J H -regular process. Among other things, we again generalize and improve a result of [6]. Already the early papers on stationary time series dealt with the Wold decomposition of a stationary process into its J -regular and J -singular parts: see [20], [10], [22] for processes on Z or R and the family J := {(−∞, x] ∩ Z : x 0} or J := {(−∞, x] : x 0}; Salehi and Scheidt [18,Theorem 2.13] proved the existence and uniqueness of a Wold decomposition for processes on an LCA group G and a family J of subsets of G invariant under translation.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 3 more Smart Citations