1984
DOI: 10.2748/tmj/1178228852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Some remarks on the instability flag

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
174
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 150 publications
(177 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
3
174
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Given a homomorphism G → H and a principal G-bundle P , the space P × G H, where G acts as left translations of H, has a natural structure of a principal Hbundle. This construction of a principal H-bundle from the principal G-bundle P is called the extension of the structure group of P to H. From [12] we know that if P is a semistable (respectively, polystable) G-bundle, then P × G H is a semistable (respectively, polystable) H-bundle.…”
Section: Definition 31 ([12]mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Given a homomorphism G → H and a principal G-bundle P , the space P × G H, where G acts as left translations of H, has a natural structure of a principal Hbundle. This construction of a principal H-bundle from the principal G-bundle P is called the extension of the structure group of P to H. From [12] we know that if P is a semistable (respectively, polystable) G-bundle, then P × G H is a semistable (respectively, polystable) H-bundle.…”
Section: Definition 31 ([12]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If H is reductive and P is a semistable G-bundle, then the extension P × G H is also semistable ( [12]). This indicates how we may define semistability in the context of parabolic G-bundles.…”
Section: Definition 31 ([12]mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We use this normalization convention also for the degree of torsion-free coherent sheaves on X, and for the degree of torsion-free coherent sheaves on X × G/P with respect to the Kähler form p * 1 ω + p * 2 ω ε . We now recall the definition of a semistable principal H-bundle (see [24,23,5]). Let Z 0 (H) be the connected component of the center of H containing the identity element.…”
Section: Dimensional Reduction For Equivariant Principal Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We recall that ad(E H ) is the vector bundle over X associated to the principal H-bundle E H for the adjoint action of H on its Lie algebra h. To prove that the principal H-bundle E H is strongly semistable, it suffices to show that the vector bundle ad(E H ) is strongly semistable. To see this, let E P ⊂ (F r X ) * E H be a reduction of structure group to a maximal parabolic subgroup P ⊂ H that violates the semistability condition, or in other words, we have (3.4) degree(((F r X ) * ad(E H ))/ad(E P )) < 0 (see [9], [8]). Consider the subbundle…”
Section: Monodromy Of Principal Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…See [9], [8] for the definition of a (strongly) semistable principal bundle with a reductive group as the structure group. We will show that the above definition coincides with the usual definition when G is reductive.…”
Section: Monodromy Of Principal Bundlesmentioning
confidence: 99%