2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3060808
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sources of experimental errors in the observation of nanoscale magnetism

Abstract: It has been recently reported that some non-magnetic materials in bulk state, exhibit magnetic behavior at the nanscale due to surface and size effects. The experimental observation of these effects is based on the measurement of very small magnetic signals. Thus, some spurious effects that are not critical for bulk materials with large magnetic signals may become important when measuring small signals (typically below 0.0001 emu). Here, we summarize some sources of these small magnetic signals that should be … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
159
0
2

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 195 publications
(161 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
159
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…44 When measuring small signals ͑below 10 −4 emu͒, magnetic traces are introduced in our samples when handling them or due to impurities in the sample substrates, so they must be considered in the analysis. Therefore, as the enhanced magnetic moment was only found in the case of SQUID and VSM measurements, and PNR and XMCD are insensitive to the substrate, a study of the MgO substrates is strongly required.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…44 When measuring small signals ͑below 10 −4 emu͒, magnetic traces are introduced in our samples when handling them or due to impurities in the sample substrates, so they must be considered in the analysis. Therefore, as the enhanced magnetic moment was only found in the case of SQUID and VSM measurements, and PNR and XMCD are insensitive to the substrate, a study of the MgO substrates is strongly required.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All possible sources of experimental errors described in Ref. 9 were considered and avoided. Samples ͑always handled with nonmetallic tools͒ were placed into a gelatin capsule and mounted on straws.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, a number of experimental artifacts may produce spurious results due to extrinsic effects. 22,23 Because of this, it is imperative to perform magnetic measurements which are impervious to many experimental artifacts of which bulk measurements suffer, and to use techniques that are intrinsically sensitive to interface magnetism.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%