2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.culher.2012.06.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soviet military maps and archaeological survey in the Samarkand region

Abstract: El artículo seleccionado no se encuentra disponible por ahora a texto completo por no haber sido facilitado todavía por el investigador a cargo del archivo del mismo.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is growing interest in the history and execution of the mapping projects carried out in various imperial dominions, particularly those of the UK [8,[51][52][53][54], but also the former USSR. The inclusion of archaeological sites on Soviet era maps of parts of the former USSR and Afghanistan produced by the Soviet Military Topographic Service has been noted [5,28,55], but these maps have been used in relatively limited areas and/or on a relatively small scale. It is notable that the types of sites that are easy to distinguish on these maps are clearly ancient sites with distinctive morphologies.…”
Section: Reconstructing Archaeological Landscapes Remotelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is growing interest in the history and execution of the mapping projects carried out in various imperial dominions, particularly those of the UK [8,[51][52][53][54], but also the former USSR. The inclusion of archaeological sites on Soviet era maps of parts of the former USSR and Afghanistan produced by the Soviet Military Topographic Service has been noted [5,28,55], but these maps have been used in relatively limited areas and/or on a relatively small scale. It is notable that the types of sites that are easy to distinguish on these maps are clearly ancient sites with distinctive morphologies.…”
Section: Reconstructing Archaeological Landscapes Remotelymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main improvements for processing CORONA images have come from studies aimed at developing a rigorous geometric approach for georeferencing the photographs and to extract digital elevation models (DEM) from the stereo capabilities of the images (Altmaier and Kany, ; Jacobsen, ; Sohn et al, ; Hamandawana et al, ; Galiatsatos, ; Mészáros et al, ). These advances were mostly developed within the framework of archaeological research, predominantly in the semi‐arid regions of the Near East (Philip et al, ; Galiatsatos et al, ; Alizadeh and Ur, ; Casana and Cothren, ; Bitelli and Girelli, ; Hall, ; Beck and Philip, ; Ur, ; see also references from the CORONA Atlas Project in Casana and Cothren, ) and temperate areas of North/Central Asia (Gheyle et al, ; Goossens et al, ; Rondelli et al, ). Most of these studies aimed at the detection of archaeological features at landscape level, such as tells or ancient hollow roads and pathways, especially in landscapes where features have been damaged or no longer survive (Kennedy, ; Ur, , ; Wilkinson, ; Comfort et al, ; Wilkinson et al, ; Hritz, ; Palmer, ).…”
Section: Corona Reconnaissance Photographsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Russian topographic maps [Turkmenskaja SSR, 1:50,000, General'nyj Stab, Moskva (1954–1958, renewed 1973), map sheets: J‐41‐109‐B, J‐41‐109‐G, J‐41‐110‐A, and J‐41‐110‐V] turned out to be very helpful by (1) providing detailed information on archeological remains and stream patterns and (2) representing the setting before 1950, when the landscape was probably much less modified than today (cf. Ref ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%