2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquaculture.2018.10.035
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Soybean meal replacement by corn distillers dried grains with solubles (DDGS) and exogenous non-starch polysaccharidases supplementation in diets for gilthead seabream (Sparus aurata) juveniles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
27
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
4
27
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…To the best of our knowledge, there are no available studies reporting the mixture of so many plant by‐products in fish diets. Studies testing increasing levels of single by‐products in gilthead seabream diets have shown that, for instance, carob seed germ meal can be included at a maximum level of 340 g/kg (Martínez‐Llorens, Baeza‐Ariño, Nogales‐Mérida, Jover‐Cerdá, & Tomás‐Vidal, ) and corn DDGS can be included at 350 g/kg (Diógenes et al, ) without negative effects on growth or protein and energy retentions. The current study showed that fish fed the PLANT diet performed better than those fed the CTRL diet, which included relatively high levels of fishmeal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To the best of our knowledge, there are no available studies reporting the mixture of so many plant by‐products in fish diets. Studies testing increasing levels of single by‐products in gilthead seabream diets have shown that, for instance, carob seed germ meal can be included at a maximum level of 340 g/kg (Martínez‐Llorens, Baeza‐Ariño, Nogales‐Mérida, Jover‐Cerdá, & Tomás‐Vidal, ) and corn DDGS can be included at 350 g/kg (Diógenes et al, ) without negative effects on growth or protein and energy retentions. The current study showed that fish fed the PLANT diet performed better than those fed the CTRL diet, which included relatively high levels of fishmeal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CTRL diet used in this study had a similar formulation to a commercial diet used nowadays in gilthead seabream production, which already includes a large amount of plant ingredients as protein sources. However, the concept beyond the scope of this study was to minimize the use of ingredients that may be used directly for human consumption and focuses more on non-conventional feed ingredients, from both animal and plant ori- (Diógenes et al, 2019) without negative effects on growth or protein and energy retentions. The current study showed that fish fed the PLANT diet performed better than those fed the CTRL diet, which included relatively high levels of fishmeal.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even with higher intake, these diets presented lower cost per unit of biomass produced when compared to the others, probably due to the utilization of meat and bone meal, which is a lower cost ingredient. Other studies have shown that the costs of fish production can be reduced by replacing, to the maximum extent possible, the use of high value protein sources such as fishmeal, with alternative energy sources and low-cost protein (Cerdeira et al, 2018;Davies et al, 2019;Diógenes et al, 2019). The inclusion of protein and energy levels above the T-37 diet contributed to the gradual increase in feeding cost without providing a significant increase in biomass, which is undesirable in both productive and environmental aspects (El Sayed et al, 2015;Salze and Davis, 2015).…”
Section: /8 Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information related to performance and physiological condition in the final stages of grow-out are insufficient, especially in reference to the larger fish (>4 kg). Supplying ideal concentrations of nutrients and energy in the creation could considerably reduce environmental impact and production costs, besides increasing the quality of the fish (Rawles et al, 2018;Diógenes et al, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quanto aos desperdícios de grãos do pós-colheita, 18,3% ocorrem durante o processo de secagem e armazenagem decorrentes da contaminação, avaria e impureza dos grãos (Reykdal, 2018). A secagem dos grãos é realizada por meio de um processo de redução da umidade do grão, conferindo importância à armazenagem, conservação e estabilização físico-química (Babalis & Belessiotis, 2004;Diógenes et al, 2019), podendo ser conduzida por métodos tradicionais ou pelo uso de caldeira através da queima de resíduos destes grãos. O uso de métodos tradicionais para secagem de grãos resulta em maior contaminação com altos índices de avaria e impurezas (Cruz et al, 2017;Ingvordsen et al, 2018).…”
Section: Introductionunclassified