2016
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.94.023502
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial curvature endgame: Reaching the limit of curvature determination

Abstract: Current constraints on spatial curvature show that it is dynamically negligible: jΩ K j ≲ 5 × 10 −3 (95% C.L.). Neglecting it as a cosmological parameter would be premature however, as more stringent constraints on Ω K at around the 10 −4 level would offer valuable tests of eternal inflation models and probe novel large-scale structure phenomena. This precision also represents the "curvature floor," beyond which constraints cannot be meaningfully improved due to the cosmic variance of horizon-scale perturbatio… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
40
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
40
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A third possible way is to consider the PL18 constraint on Ω K as a, now reasonably unlikely, statistical fluctuation. Fortunately, future measurements will fully confirm or falsify current tensions and the PL18 evidence for curvature 56,57 . In the meantime, we argue that the tensions with ΛCDM present in the PL18 release should not be discarded merely as a statistical fluctuation but must be seriously investigated, since at face value they point towards a drastic rethinking of the current cosmological concordance model.…”
Section: It Is Interesting To Investigate If Astrophysical Measuremenmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…A third possible way is to consider the PL18 constraint on Ω K as a, now reasonably unlikely, statistical fluctuation. Fortunately, future measurements will fully confirm or falsify current tensions and the PL18 evidence for curvature 56,57 . In the meantime, we argue that the tensions with ΛCDM present in the PL18 release should not be discarded merely as a statistical fluctuation but must be seriously investigated, since at face value they point towards a drastic rethinking of the current cosmological concordance model.…”
Section: It Is Interesting To Investigate If Astrophysical Measuremenmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…Other GR effects related to the behaviour of curvature in inhomogeneous spacetimes also contribute an apparent shift in the background cosmology. Given that current curvature upper limits are 1 or 2 orders of magnitude away from the level required to probe most of these effects, there is an imperative to continue pushing Ω k constraints to greater precision (i.e., to about 0.01% level) [21]. In addition, current standard measurements of the curvature parameter come from the combination of CMB and LSS, which does not take into account certain GR effects.…”
Section: Spatial Curvature In Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, to test models of inflation such as eternal inflation, we need to reach the cosmic variance limit for spatial curvature [21].…”
Section: Spatial Curvature In Cosmologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact other limitations, apart from those explained in the bulk of this communication might appear, namely there are at least two effects which, for the sake of simplicity, were neglected in this communication. The first one considers the eventual role of the spatial curvature Ω k in fixing constraints, due to the fact that Ω k = 0 can induce a time variation for the dark energy equation of state [19] and eventually distort the cosmological constraints as recently claimed in [20]. The second, additional limitations concerns other effects such as both gravitational and Doppler lensing [21], or even local gravitational redshifts [22], which may involve the appearance of extra scatters in the Hubble diagram, a fact which might degrade cosmological constraints as obtained from SNe Ia data analysis.…”
Section: Conclusion and Prospectsmentioning
confidence: 99%