2020
DOI: 10.21307/jofnem-2020-033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial distribution and risk area assessment of Aphelenchoides besseyi using geostatistical approaches in Giridih district of Jharkhand, India

Abstract: Distributed widely across the rice growing regions of India, the rice leaf and bud nematode (Aphelenchoides besseyi Christie 1942) can cause substantial yield loss in rice. Whitening of leaf tips is the characteristics damage symptom of this nematode and therefore it is popularly referred to as the rice white tip nematode (RWTN). While information on the damage severity of RWTN is available from others parts of the country, to date, no information is available from the state of Jharkhand. In order to generate … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They are responsible for poor yield in quantity and quality (Atungwu and Afolami, 2003). However, PPNs vary over time and space and need to be routinely identified at definite location and time for them to be effectively managed (Mondal et al, 2020). While use of chemical nematicides have its advantages in the control of PPNs, the environmental and health consequences of some of these chemicals have been widely campaigned against.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They are responsible for poor yield in quantity and quality (Atungwu and Afolami, 2003). However, PPNs vary over time and space and need to be routinely identified at definite location and time for them to be effectively managed (Mondal et al, 2020). While use of chemical nematicides have its advantages in the control of PPNs, the environmental and health consequences of some of these chemicals have been widely campaigned against.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%