1997
DOI: 10.1086/303713
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Distribution of Embedded Clusters in the Rosette Molecular Cloud: Implications for Cluster Formation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
130
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
6
130
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Table 3 of RZL. The nine embedded clusters identified by Phelps & Lada (1998;PL) and Román-Zúñiga et al (2008b;REFL) in the Herschel field are also labelled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Table 3 of RZL. The nine embedded clusters identified by Phelps & Lada (1998;PL) and Román-Zúñiga et al (2008b;REFL) in the Herschel field are also labelled.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The structure of material within the RMC has been previously examined by Williams et al (1995), Schneider et al (1998) and Dent et al (2009) using various CO observations. Alternatively, the populations of young stellar objects (YSOs) within the RMC have been studied by Phelps & Lada (1998), Li & Smith (2005), Poulton et al (2008), andRomán-Zúñiga et al (2008b) using infrared observations. Notably, these studies identified 10 embedded clusters within the RMC, i.e., PL01-07 and REFL08-10.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both nebulae are likely to have been formed by the interaction of the central cluster(s) of OB stars (NGC 2244 in the case of the Rosette nebula). Phelps & Lada (1997) also report the detection of a number of embedded compact clusters which they suggest result from the interaction of NGC 2244 with the host molecular cloud. Embedded cluster are also found in the environs of the young open clusters IC 1396 and IC 1805 (Clarke et al 2000 and references therein), although the hot star population inferred for the G305 complex is significantly in excess of the populations of any of these regions.…”
Section: Comparison With Other Star Forming Regionsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…5b) with the levels 3, 20, 25, and 40 arcmin −2 , meaning a cluster must have a star density excess greater than 3 arcmin −2 . Figure 6 shows the result with the clusters identification from Phelps & Lada (1997) and . The levels 20, 25, and 40 arcmin −2 are arbitrary chosen to split the connected clusters PL 04, PL 05, PL 06, and REFL 08 in accordance with .…”
Section: Cluster Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 99%