Spatial epidemiologic analysis of the liver cancer and gallbladder cancer incidence and its determinants in South Korea

Jang, Jieun; Yoo, Dae-Sung; Chun, Byung Chul

doi:10.1186/s12889-021-12184-8

Cited by 9 publications

(16 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The high incidence of liver cancer in southwestern and south-eastern Korea was associated with geographic variations in household income and the prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection. 16 Meanwhile, the incidence rate of gallbladder cancer was high in the southeastern region. This finding was associated with household income and liver fluke infection.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Thus, the geographical location of covered populations by cancer registries could lead to biased incidence statistics. The high incidence of liver cancer in southwestern and south‐eastern Korea was associated with geographic variations in household income and the prevalence of hepatitis B virus infection 16 . Meanwhile, the incidence rate of gallbladder cancer was high in the southeastern region.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Differences in the incidence and mortality of digestive cancer between Global Cancer Observatory 2020 and Global Burden of Disease 2019

Yu,

Bai,

Zhou

et al. 2023

Intl Journal of Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The burden of digestive cancers is increasing worldwide. The Global Cancer Observatory (GLOBOCAN) 2020 and the Global Burden of Disease (GBD) 2019 are two primary cancer databases, which have a significant impact on policy formulation and resource allocation. We aim to compare the incidence and mortality of digestive cancers between them. Digestive cancer (esophageal, stomach, colorectal, liver, gallbladder and pancreatic cancer) incidence was obtained from the Cancer Today and GBD 2019 result tool. The top five countries with the most or minor difference between GLOBOCAN 2020 and GBD 2019 in age‐standardized incidence rates (ASIRs) of digestive cancers were identified. A systematic search on the incidence of specific digestive cancer in selected countries from PubMed and Embase was conducted, and 20 of 281 publications were included. The most significant differences in digestive cancers incidence were commonly found in Asian countries (70%), particularly Indonesia, Vietnam and Myanmar, located in Southeast Asia. The ASIRs for most digestive cancers, except liver cancer, in GLOBOCAN 2020 were higher than those in GBD 2019. Gallbladder cancer had the highest average ratio, followed by liver cancer. The most commonly used standard population was Segi's standard population, followed by the World Health Organization standard population. The data sources nor the processing methods of GLOBOCAN 2020 and GBD 2019 were not similar. Low‐ and middle‐income countries without population‐based cancer registries were more likely to have selection bias in data collection and amplify regional variations of etiological factors. Better judgments on the quality of cancer data can be made.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Differences in the incidence and mortality of digestive cancer between Global Cancer Observatory 2020 and Global Burden of Disease 2019

Yu,

Bai,

Zhou

et al. 2023

Intl Journal of Cancer

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Also, this study is based on large population-based data from an NCI SEER program cancer registry that meets the high-quality standards. Furthermore, SaTScan spatial analysis used in identifying geographic clusters is a free globally used cluster-detecting epidemiologic tool for identifying spatial clusters of infectious and chronic diseases, including COVID-19, malaria, cancers, and others …”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…24,[45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54] Figure 2. Census Tract-Level Characteristics of Patients With Late-Stage Cervical Cancer in Texas, 2014-2018 by Cluster Classification Bar chart showing the characteristics of census tracts containing late-stage cervical cancer cases stratified by cluster classification (hot spots, cold spots, rest of Texas).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Geographic Variation in Late-Stage Cervical Cancer Diagnosis

Sokale,

Thrift,

Montealegre

et al. 2023

JAMA Netw Open

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ImportanceThere are stark disparities in cervical cancer burden in the United States, notably by race and ethnicity and geography. Late-stage diagnosis is an indicator of inadequate access to and utilization of screening.ObjectiveTo identify geospatial clusters of late-stage cervical cancer at time of diagnosis in Texas.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis population-based cross-sectional study used incident cervical cancer data from the Texas Cancer Registry from 2014 to 2018 of female patients aged 18 years or older. Late-stage cervical cancer cases were geocoded at the census tract level (n = 5265) using their residential coordinates (latitude and longitude) at the time of diagnosis. Statistical analysis was performed from April to September 2023.ExposuresCensus tract of residence at diagnosis.Main Outcome and MeasuresLate-stage cervical cancer diagnosis (ie, cases classified by the National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results summary stages 2 to 4 [regional spread] or 7 [distant metastasis]). A Poisson probability-based model of the SaTScan purely spatial scan statistics was applied at the census tract–level to identify geographic clusters of higher (hot spots) or lower (cold spots) proportions than expected of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis and adjusted for age.ResultsAmong a total of 6484 female patients with incident cervical cancer cases (mean [SD] age, 48.7 [14.7] years), 2300 (35.5%) were Hispanic, 798 (12.3%) were non-Hispanic Black, 3090 (47.6%) were non-Hispanic White, and 296 (4.6%) were other race or ethnicity. Of the 6484 patients, 2892 with late-stage diagnosis (mean [SD] age, 51.8 [14.4] years were analyzed. Among patients with late-stage diagnosis, 1069 (37.0%) were Hispanic, 417 (14.4%) were non-Hispanic Black, 1307 (45.2%) were non-Hispanic White, and 99 (3.4%) were other race or ethnicity. SaTScan spatial analysis identified 7 statistically significant clusters of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis in Texas, of which 4 were hot spots and 3 were cold spots. Hot spots included 1128 census tracts, predominantly in the South Texas Plains, Gulf Coast, and Prairies and Lakes (North Texas) regions. Of the 2892 patients with late-stage cervical cancer, 880 (30.4%) were observed within hot spots. Census tract–level comparison of characteristics of clusters suggested that hot spots differed significantly from cold spots and the rest of Texas by proportions of racial and ethnic groups, non–US born persons, and socioeconomic status.Conclusions and RelevanceIn this cross-sectional study examining geospatial clusters of late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis, place-based disparities were found in late-stage cervical cancer diagnosis in Texas. These findings suggest that these communities may benefit from aggressive cervical cancer interventions.

show abstract

“…Gallbladder cancer is the 22nd most prevalent and 17th most deadly cancer worldwide [ 1 , 2 , 3 ]. It is noted to disproportionately affect females more than males, perhaps due to the higher propensity of females to have gallstone disease [ 4 ]. The incidence of gallbladder cancer is characterized by marked geographic and ethnic variations; there is high to moderate incidence in India, especially northeast and central India, South America (Chile, Bolivia, Colombia), East Asia (Korea, Japan, China), and central Europe (Slovakia, Poland, Czech Republic) [ 5 , 6 ].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Precursor Lesions of Gallbladder Carcinoma: Disease Concept, Pathology, and Genetics

et al. 2022

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Understanding the pathogenesis and carcinogenesis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma is important. The fifth edition of the World Health Organization’s tumor classification of the digestive system indicates three types of preinvasive neoplasm of the gallbladder: pyloric gland adenoma (PGA), biliary intraepithelial neoplasia (BilIN), and intracholecystic papillary neoplasm (ICPN). New terminologies have also been introduced, such as intracholecystic papillary-tubular neoplasm, gastric pyloric, simple mucinous type, and intracholecystic tubular non-mucinous neoplasm (ICTN). Pancreatobiliary maljunction (PBM) poses a markedly high risk for bile duct carcinoma, which was analyzed and investigated mainly by Asian researchers in the past; however, recent studies have clarified a similar significance of biliary carcinogenesis in Western countries as well. In this study, we reviewed and summarized information on three gallbladder neoplastic precursors, PGA, BilIN, and ICPN, and gallbladder lesions in patients with PBM.

show abstract

Spatial epidemiologic analysis of the liver cancer and gallbladder cancer incidence and its determinants in South Korea

Cited by 9 publications

References 38 publications

Differences in the incidence and mortality of digestive cancer between Global Cancer Observatory 2020 and Global Burden of Disease 2019

Differences in the incidence and mortality of digestive cancer between Global Cancer Observatory 2020 and Global Burden of Disease 2019

Geographic Variation in Late-Stage Cervical Cancer Diagnosis

Precursor Lesions of Gallbladder Carcinoma: Disease Concept, Pathology, and Genetics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About