2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00024-016-1385-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial Evaluation and Verification of Earthquake Simulators

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In agreement with Wilson et al (2017), we may conclude that the size and the quality of the historical seismicity observed in the study area are too limited for achieving a robust comparison with the simulations.…”
Section: Magnitude Distributionsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In agreement with Wilson et al (2017), we may conclude that the size and the quality of the historical seismicity observed in the study area are too limited for achieving a robust comparison with the simulations.…”
Section: Magnitude Distributionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Recall that the magnitude distribution of the earthquakes in the synthetic catalog is not assigned. It is a consequence of the self-organized physical process of the simulator mode and can be changed by the choice of the free parameters S-R and A-R. As mentioned by Wilson et al (2017), these simulation parameters are adjusted so that real earthquake catalogs are matched by synthetic catalogs in their scaling properties. For an analysis of the role of the S-R and A-R parameters in our simulation algorithm, see Console et al (2017).…”
Section: Algorithm Of the Simulator Codementioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assigned the global frictional parameters of the fault model based on the best‐fit results of these studies. Multiple simulations were carried out in order to tune the frictional parameters to match observed earthquake magnitude‐rupture area scaling relations (Leonard, 2010; Wells & Coppersmith, 1994), a procedure followed by numerous modeling studies before (e.g., Console, Vannoli, & Carluccio, 2018; Shaw et al., 2018; Wilson et al., 2018). It is an iterative process and the aim is to generate a frequency distribution of moderate‐sized events similar to the behavior of instrumental seismicity in the Eastern Betic region, with a Gutenberg‐Richter b‐value close to 1.0 ± 0.1 (García‐Mayordomo, 2005; IGN‐UPM, 2013; Villamor, 2002).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%