2016
DOI: 10.1186/s12863-016-0371-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial genetic structure, genetic diversity and pollen dispersal in a harvested population of Astrocaryum aculeatum in the Brazilian Amazon

Abstract: BackgroundAstrocaryum aculeatum is a palm tree species native to the tropical regions of South America, exploited commercially by local farmers for the pulp extracted from its fruits. The objective of this research was to compare the genetic diversity between adult plants and seedlings from open-pollinated seeds, quantify the pollen flow and dispersal, the spatial genetic structure, and the effective size of a population that has been continuously harvested for its fruits. The study was carried out in a natura… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
18
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
4
18
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…aculeatum, A. murumuru, and A. paramaca. Levels of genetic diversity (H E and H O ) found for the species of Astrocaryum presented here were also lower than most of the literature available for other palm species using microsatellite markers, which showed a minimum estimate for H E of 0.5 (Conte et al, 2008;Elshibli and Korpelainen, 2008;Choo et al, 2010;Namoff et al, 2011;Ottewell et al, 2012;Nazareno and dos Reis, 2014;Ramos et al, 2016). Nevertheless, similar results for H E and H O were found for Chamaerops humilis, with a mean N A equal to 3.67 and H E and H O equal to 0.374 and 0.366, respectively (Giovino et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…aculeatum, A. murumuru, and A. paramaca. Levels of genetic diversity (H E and H O ) found for the species of Astrocaryum presented here were also lower than most of the literature available for other palm species using microsatellite markers, which showed a minimum estimate for H E of 0.5 (Conte et al, 2008;Elshibli and Korpelainen, 2008;Choo et al, 2010;Namoff et al, 2011;Ottewell et al, 2012;Nazareno and dos Reis, 2014;Ramos et al, 2016). Nevertheless, similar results for H E and H O were found for Chamaerops humilis, with a mean N A equal to 3.67 and H E and H O equal to 0.374 and 0.366, respectively (Giovino et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 80%
“…Nevertheless, similar results for H E and H O were found for Chamaerops humilis, with a mean N A equal to 3.67 and H E and H O equal to 0.374 and 0.366, respectively (Giovino et al, 2014). It is worth mentioning that studies with other congeners of Astrocaryum (Oliveira et al, 2014;Ramos et al, 2012Ramos et al, , 2016) that used the same microsatellite set used here, excluded monomorphic loci from the estimation of genetic diversity; this automatically increased the estimates for these parameters [given the formula used to calculate heterozygosity (H = 2 ( 1)…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The genetic diversity analysis (Table 1) shows that E. precatoria is a species that maintains similar patterns of genetic diversity over generations, among reproductive, immature, young, and seedling ontogenetic stages. Other studies comparing parents and progenies in the species Astrocaryum aculeatum (Ramos, Dequigiovanni, Sebbenn et al, 2016), Swietenia humilis (Rosas, Quesada, Lobo, & Sork, 2011), Copaifera langsdorffii , and Hymenaea courbaril (Carneiro et al, 2011) reported similar results to those obtained with E. precatoria.…”
Section: Genetic Diversitysupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Pollen flow, selfing, and pollen dispersal distance were also estimated assuming an exponential power dispersal Kernel (Austerlitz et al, 2004) with program NM+ (Chybicki & Burczyk, 2010), based on the neighborhood model (Burczyk, Adams, Moran, & Griffin, 2002). In this model, the distances of pollen dispersal and patterns were not derived from individual paternity assignments, as in the case of CERVUS, but indirectly from a spatially explicit mating model (Ramos, Dequigiovanni, Sebbenn et al, 2016). The model defines that the paternity of a progeny may result from: (a) self-fertilization with probability s; (b) pollen immigration from outside the plot, with probability m p ; or (c) crossing with a male located within the plot, with probability 1-s-m p (Burczyk et al, 2002).…”
Section: Analysis Of Pollen and Seed Dispersal Patternsmentioning
confidence: 99%