2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.neucli.2007.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial localization of EEG electrodes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
67
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 76 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
67
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Assuming the exact placement of the base electrodes the accuracy of the proposed method is assessed to be within the range of 5.5 mm. This is very close to the other methods [7,8] which claim comparative accuracy of up to 5 mm. To increase the accuracy it would be justified to mark more than five electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Assuming the exact placement of the base electrodes the accuracy of the proposed method is assessed to be within the range of 5.5 mm. This is very close to the other methods [7,8] which claim comparative accuracy of up to 5 mm. To increase the accuracy it would be justified to mark more than five electrodes.…”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 84%
“…Reference and ground were taken at FCz (midline, central frontal) and AFz (midline, anterior frontal), respectively. Positions of the 96 electrodes were obtained as follows: the three fiducials (nasion, left ear, right ear) and six well distributed electrodes (Fp1, Fp2, P3, P4, Cz, Oz) were measured manually with calipers (Koessler et al, 2007). Those measures were then used to obtain the positions of all electrodes after computation of the affine transformation that best fitted the canonical EEG cap provided in SPM8 onto the head of each subject (Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, http://www.fil.ion.ucl.ac.uk/spm/).…”
Section: Eeg Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) Manual methods, 8,14 (ii) Electromagnetic radiofrequency (RF) digitizer usage, 28,33 (iii) Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI)-assisted approaches, 10,25,40,44 (iv) Ultrasonic wave transmission and reflection methods, 29,30 (v) Photogrammetric measurement principles. 5,38 The photogrammetric method seems to be a fast, remote, patient specific, repeatable procedure, and it is less prone to human error.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%