2015
DOI: 10.5194/amt-8-4487-2015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial mapping of ground-based observations of total ozone

Abstract: Abstract. Total column ozone variations estimated using ground-based stations provide important independent source of information in addition to satellite-based estimates. This estimation has been vigorously challenged by data inhomogeneity in time and by the irregularity of the spatial distribution of stations, as well as by interruptions in observation records. Furthermore, some stations have calibration issues and thus observations may drift. In this paper we compare the spatial interpolation of ozone level… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The link between the Matérn field and the SPDE is given by α = ν + d /2, which makes explicit the relationship between dimension and regularity for fixed α . On more general manifolds than double-struckRd, such as the sphere (Chang, Guillas and Fioletov, ), the direct Matérn representation is not easy to implement (for example, Matérn covariance with great circle distance is valid only at ν ∈ (0,0.5] (Gneiting, )), but the SPDE formulation provides a natural generalization, and the ν ‐parameter will keep its meaning as the quantitative measure of regularity. Instead of defining Matérn fields by the covariance function, Lindgren et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The link between the Matérn field and the SPDE is given by α = ν + d /2, which makes explicit the relationship between dimension and regularity for fixed α . On more general manifolds than double-struckRd, such as the sphere (Chang, Guillas and Fioletov, ), the direct Matérn representation is not easy to implement (for example, Matérn covariance with great circle distance is valid only at ν ∈ (0,0.5] (Gneiting, )), but the SPDE formulation provides a natural generalization, and the ν ‐parameter will keep its meaning as the quantitative measure of regularity. Instead of defining Matérn fields by the covariance function, Lindgren et al .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, it is challenging for covariance functions with light tails to capture variation among observations widely separated over the spatial domain (e.g., Matérn) [ Kleiber and Porcu , ] as it is the case for temperatures over the globe. Newly developed statistical techniques outperform covariance‐based kriging in terms of accuracy and uncertainty quantification over the globe [ Chang et al , ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning this issue, Chang et al . [] presented a possible solution. In our study, we assume that the prediction residuals satisfy the intrinsic stationarity assumption, and then the coefficients λ i in equation can be solved by variogram γ .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%