2018
DOI: 10.1080/00207233.2018.1535870
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial modelling of gaseous emissions from two municipal solid waste dump sites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method is simple and has been widely used in providing trace gas emission rates for dispersion models with the purpose of assessing environmental impacts and health risks (e.g. Tagaris et al, 2003;Paraskaki and Lazaridis, 2005;Pagé et al, 2007;Moolla et al, 2013;Cai et al, 2015;Abdul-Wahab et al, 2016;Araiza-Aguilar and Rojas-Valencia, 2018). In the cited papers, emission rates of target odorous or toxic trace compounds were calculated by using various LFG production models and applying Equation (4).…”
Section: Lfg Production Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method is simple and has been widely used in providing trace gas emission rates for dispersion models with the purpose of assessing environmental impacts and health risks (e.g. Tagaris et al, 2003;Paraskaki and Lazaridis, 2005;Pagé et al, 2007;Moolla et al, 2013;Cai et al, 2015;Abdul-Wahab et al, 2016;Araiza-Aguilar and Rojas-Valencia, 2018). In the cited papers, emission rates of target odorous or toxic trace compounds were calculated by using various LFG production models and applying Equation (4).…”
Section: Lfg Production Modellingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The residual errors were found to be 11.81 nm, 0.041, 1.23 mV, and 3.44% for PS, PDI, ZP, and EE, respectively. Such small residual error values indicate that the observed results were very close to the predicted ones, thus ensuring good model fitting and efficient optimization [ 64 , 65 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2007, a study conducted in Kathmandu also found the coefficient of correlation to be 0.94 (Dangi et al 2011). Though there are other socioeconomic variables (population density, income, GDP) for forecasting the MSW generation, the population trend is widely used by researchers (Khan and Burney 1989;Wei et al 2013;Ghinea et al 2016;Azadi and Karimi-Jashni 2016;Araiza-Aguilar et al 2020). The coefficient of 0.956 obtained for solid waste generation of KMC is also near to the study conducted in Mexico, which found a coefficient of 0.975 (Araiza-Aguilar et al 2020).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%