2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104532
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variability characteristics of the effective friction angle of Crag deposits and its effects on slope stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In recent years, more attention has been paid to the spatial variability of soil parameters in geotechnical engineering. With the help of this random field model, relevant scholars have studied the influence of shield tunnel surface deformation [17,18], excavation surface stability [19], foundation settlement and liquefaction [20,21], slope stability [22][23][24], and other problems. e research results show that there is a great difference between random field theory and random variable theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, more attention has been paid to the spatial variability of soil parameters in geotechnical engineering. With the help of this random field model, relevant scholars have studied the influence of shield tunnel surface deformation [17,18], excavation surface stability [19], foundation settlement and liquefaction [20,21], slope stability [22][23][24], and other problems. e research results show that there is a great difference between random field theory and random variable theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…He proposed a model to calculate the failure probability of a mammal bioerosion levee considering the peak flow discharge and flood duration. Agbaje et al [5] studied the influence of the effective friction angle on slope stability based on the Grag deposits in the East of England, UK. It pointed out that the total factor of safety was usually higher, leading to overestimation of the stability of a slope.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%