2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10333-007-0072-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spatial variability of bulk soil electrical conductivity in a Malaysian paddy field: key to soil management

Abstract: On-the-go EC sensor is a useful tool in mapping the apparent soil electrical conductivity (EC a ) to identify areas of contrasting soil properties. In non-saline soils, EC a is a substitute measurement for soil texture. It is directly related to both water holding capacity and cation exchange capacity (CEC), which are key ingredients of productivity. This sensor measures the EC a across a field quickly and gives detailed soil features (1-s interval) with few operators. Hence, a dense sampling is possible and t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
16
0
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar low variance in soil solution pH has been reported elsewhere for instance Aimrun, Amin, Ahmad, Hanafi, and Chan (2007) in Malaysia (2.6%); Abu and Malgwi (2011) in Nigeria (10.3%) and Addis, Klik, and Strohmeier (2015) in Ethiopia (6.5%). This is because pH values are indicated on log scale of proton concentration in soil solution; otherwise there would be a much higher variability if soil acidity is expressed in terms of proton concentration directly (Sun, Zhou, & Zhao, 2003).…”
Section: Soil Phsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Similar low variance in soil solution pH has been reported elsewhere for instance Aimrun, Amin, Ahmad, Hanafi, and Chan (2007) in Malaysia (2.6%); Abu and Malgwi (2011) in Nigeria (10.3%) and Addis, Klik, and Strohmeier (2015) in Ethiopia (6.5%). This is because pH values are indicated on log scale of proton concentration in soil solution; otherwise there would be a much higher variability if soil acidity is expressed in terms of proton concentration directly (Sun, Zhou, & Zhao, 2003).…”
Section: Soil Phsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…These values are relatively low when compared to the apparent electrical conductivity , as shown by Yan et al (2007c) and Yan et al (2008). In non-saline soils, Machado et al (2006) and Aimrun et al (2007) have obtained average apparent soil electrical conductivity values of 5.2 and 5.67 mS m -1 , respectively. These mean values of electrical conductivity are still higher than those found in this study.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This amplitude is less than that obtained by Machado et al (2006), who recorded minimum and maximum conductivities of 1.90 and 13.70 mS m -1 , respectively. Aimrun et al (2007) . These differences in amplitude may not relate to soil moisture conditions.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ordinary kriging have been applied to extrapolate the values of unsampled field parts. To build kriged surface maps ArcGIS 9.2 was used (Blackmore, 1999;Aimrun et al, 2007). Thylen and Murphy (1996); Blackmore and Marshall (1996) and Blackmore (1999) applied this technique in crop properties mapping.…”
Section: Soilmentioning
confidence: 99%