2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2022.109127
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Special considerations for evaluating psilocybin-facilitated psychotherapy in vulnerable populations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The percentage of participants who reported lifetime classic psychedelic use (22%) was similar to the prevalence of lifetime classic psychedelic use (23%) in another study using Prolific Academic for study recruitment, 25 but it was still higher than the prevalence in the United States (14%) in previous research using the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). 2 This may be because the current sample was of higher socioeconomic status than the NSDUH sample 26 and also because the previous research using the NSDUH likely underestimates ayahuasca and DMT use. 25 Second, the questionnaire did not include items related to set and setting of the most insightful classic psychedelic experience, which could have been used to identify context-dependent variables related to psychological insight, health behavior, and physical health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The percentage of participants who reported lifetime classic psychedelic use (22%) was similar to the prevalence of lifetime classic psychedelic use (23%) in another study using Prolific Academic for study recruitment, 25 but it was still higher than the prevalence in the United States (14%) in previous research using the National Survey on Drug Use and Health (NSDUH). 2 This may be because the current sample was of higher socioeconomic status than the NSDUH sample 26 and also because the previous research using the NSDUH likely underestimates ayahuasca and DMT use. 25 Second, the questionnaire did not include items related to set and setting of the most insightful classic psychedelic experience, which could have been used to identify context-dependent variables related to psychological insight, health behavior, and physical health.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Our sample was predominantly white, young and educated, and although this appears to partly reflect the common demographic profile of psychedelic users ( Yockey et al, 2020 ), GDS may also disproportionately reach these populations ( Barratt et al, 2017 ). Low representation of ethnic minorities and socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals is a significant problem in psychedelic research, especially considering these populations are greatly affected by the mental conditions that any future psychedelic therapy would be used to treat ( Ortiz et al, 2022 ; Rea and Wallace, 2021 ; Williams et al, 2021 ); and recent evidence does suggest the psychedelic user population is becoming increasingly ethnically diverse ( Davis et al, 2022 ). Furthermore, those reached by the survey advertising and who choose to volunteer may have specific interests and knowledge about the topics of the survey ( Eysenbach and Wyatt, 2002 ); and for instance be better educated about optimal practices of psychedelic use, contributing to more favourable outcomes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to the commencement of the study, a rigorous individual assessment, specifically focusing on cognitive capabilities, is imperative. If significant impairment in cognitive capacity is identified among AD patients, researchers must ascertain the necessity of legal guardians’ involvement and ensure their legal eligibility for providing informed consent ( Lawrence et al, 2014 ; Ortiz et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Legal and Ethical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cognitive state of AD patients may influence their perception of time and processing abilities ( Honma et al, 2015 ). Therefore, the study design should contemplate the reduction of experimental duration to accommodate potential shorter attention spans and tolerance levels in patients ( Ortiz et al, 2022 ).…”
Section: Legal and Ethical Issuesmentioning
confidence: 99%