“…Because advances in the systematics of the genus Ctenomys have encompassed its diversity in a sectorized and disparate manner, the current taxonomic knowledge of Ctenomys remains uneven among species groups and geographic areas. While for some species or clades, their alpha taxonomy, phylogeny, and geographic variation are relatively well studied, others are known only through original descriptions, which are often insufficient for making taxonomic decisions (see reviews in Freitas 2021 andD'Elía et al 2021). In this context, the populations of Ctenomys distributed in the coastal area of central Argentina have been extensively studied through different approaches and disciplines, including alpha taxonomy and morphology (Thomas 1898(Thomas , 1912Rusconi 1934;Contreras and Reig 1965;Reig et al 1965Reig et al , 1990Contreras 1972;Vitullo et al 1988;De Santis et al 1998;Zenuto et al 2003;Justo et al 2003;Medina et al 2007;García Esponda et al 2009), cytogenetics and genetics (Kiblisky and Reig 1966;Massarini et al 1991Massarini et al , 1995Massarini et al , 2002Cutrera et al 2005), phylogeography (Mora et al 2006(Mora et al , 2010, ecology and behavior (Contreras and Reig 1965;Pearson et al 1968;Antinuchi and Busch 1992;Zenuto and Busch 1995;Zenuto and Fanjul 2002;Busch et al 2000;Justo et al 2003;Busch 2002a, 2002b;Cutrera et al 2006;Antinuchi et al 2007;Vassallo 2006), functional morph...…”