2019 International Conference on Electrical, Computer and Communication Engineering (ECCE) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ecace.2019.8679166
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Species Identification using DNA Barcode Sequences through Supervised Learning Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the ABGD and ASAP methods, species delimitation through characterbased supervised machine learning methods was utilized to understand better the confirmation of the initial identification [84]. So far, several studies have performed the character-based barcoding approach, which has proved its usefulness in identifying plant species better than the conventional unsupervised methods [52][53][54]85]. In our analysis, the unsupervised ASAP method tended to provide a better resolution potential for the rbcL dataset than its neighboring ABGD method (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Following the ABGD and ASAP methods, species delimitation through characterbased supervised machine learning methods was utilized to understand better the confirmation of the initial identification [84]. So far, several studies have performed the character-based barcoding approach, which has proved its usefulness in identifying plant species better than the conventional unsupervised methods [52][53][54]85]. In our analysis, the unsupervised ASAP method tended to provide a better resolution potential for the rbcL dataset than its neighboring ABGD method (Table 1).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The most conventional DNA barcode analysis method is the pairwise distance-based unsupervised Operational Taxonomic Unit (OTU) picking method, where Automated Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) is the most widely used tool, followed by the recently developed Assemble Species by Automatic Partitioning (ASAP) [50,51]. Comparatively, some studies have shown a higher rate of species discrimination using the supervised learning approach [21,[52][53][54][55]. Thus, in this study, we used a comparative approach of implementing both unsupervised and supervised methods for species delimitation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Methods based on DAN barcode can be categorized into four types: tree-based methods [18], similarity-based methods [27], character-based methods [28], and machine learning-based methods [29][30][31]. In biology, DNA barcode-based methods typically analyze DNA sequences, then calculate genetic distances and construct phylogenetic trees to classify organisms [32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For animal groups, cytochrome c oxidase 1 gene (COI) is used as a barcode, while matK and rbcL are used for identifying land plants, and ITS is used for fungi [7]. The problem then translates into classifying barcodes to a known species in a fast and efficient way [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%