1994
DOI: 10.1016/0022-2313(94)90012-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopy and crystal-field analysis for Nd3+ in GdLiF4

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…are given. In addition, the a polarised measurements on 31 G 523 0.000 0.004 0.033 7,8 LiYF :Nd are found to be similar to the s polarisation, …”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…are given. In addition, the a polarised measurements on 31 G 523 0.000 0.004 0.033 7,8 LiYF :Nd are found to be similar to the s polarisation, …”
mentioning
confidence: 73%
“…In view of these single crystal. The obtained parameter sets are evaluated in applications the energy diagram of the neodymium ion in a graphical simulation of another spectroscopic phenomLiYF is extensively studied using the approximating D enon, magnetic circular dichroism (MCD), and in a non-4 2 d 31 point group as site symmetry of the Nd [6][7][8][9]. More spectroscopic property, namely the magnetic susceptibility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Trivalent rare earth (Re 3+ ) ion doped LiYF 4 is one of the most commonly used fluoride laser host crystal [1][2][3]. Many spectroscopic studies have been performed on trivalent rare earth ion doped LiYF 4 crystal.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(iii) For simplicity, the D 2d approach instead of S 4 symmetry is adopted to describe the crystal-field interaction of (4) in this work. In fact, even though one takes the exact S 4 symmetry, the magnitudes of the imaginary parts of the rank-4 and rank-6 crystal-field parameters are very small, as shown in [21,32,33], and so their contributions to the coefficient C( 4 I 15/2 ;Γ γ (γ ) M J1 ) or C( 4 I 13/2 ;Γ γ (γ ) M J2 ) in Γ γ and the g factors are expected to be no more than 4%. (iv) Even in the approach of D 2d symmetry, the angular distortions for the polar angles θ j due to the size and charge mismatching substitution of Ca 2+ by Er 3+ are not considered in the calculations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%