2017
DOI: 10.3847/2041-8213/aa653d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spectroscopy of Ultra-diffuse Galaxies in the Coma Cluster

Abstract: We present spectra of five ultra-diffuse galaxies (UDGs) in the vicinity of the Coma cluster obtained with the Multi-object Double Spectrograph on the Large Binocular Telescope. We confirm four of these as members of the cluster, quintupling the number of spectroscopically confirmed systems. Like the previously confirmed large (projected half-light radius >4.6 kpc) UDG, DF44, the systems we targeted all have projected half-light radii 2.9 kpc > . As such, we spectroscopically confirm a population of physically… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

11
95
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(107 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
11
95
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also analyze all archival HST/ACS images of UDGs in Coma. Kadowaki et al 2017), and our redshifts confirm that Dragonfly 44, DFX1, and Dragonfly 42 are all members of the Coma cluster. …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…We also analyze all archival HST/ACS images of UDGs in Coma. Kadowaki et al 2017), and our redshifts confirm that Dragonfly 44, DFX1, and Dragonfly 42 are all members of the Coma cluster. …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 66%
“…The derived ages and metallicities are typical for low-mass galaxies in cluster environments (e.g., van Zee et al 2004;Penny & Conselice 2008;Smith et al 2009). Kadowaki et al (2017) concluded that, on average, four Coma cluster UDGs in their sample are metal-poor by visually comparing the stacked spectrum against SSP models. The UDGs in our samples have metallicities consistent with this conclusion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UDGs have also been found in other nearby galaxy clusters (e.g., Mihos et al 2015;Muñoz et al 2015;Martínez-Delgado et al 2016;van der Burg et al 2016;Román & Trujillo 2017), group environments (e.g., Merritt et al 2016), and the field (e.g., Bellazzini et al 2017; Leisman et al 2017). Owing to their diffuse nature, only a few UDGs have a measured spectroscopic redshift (e.g., van Dokkum et al 2015a;Kadowaki et al 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prole et al 2019), are available for many UDGs but are of limited value in determining the properties of the stellar populations, while spectroscopy, which can provide the necessary information, is only available for a small number of galaxies (e.g. Martínez-Delgado et al 2016;Kadowaki et al 2017;Ruiz-Lara et al 2018;Ferré-Mateu et al 2018;Gu et al 2018).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%