2015
DOI: 10.1111/jai.12726
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sperm motility evaluation following long-term storage (5 years) of cryopreserved sea bream (Sparus aurata L., 1758) semen

Abstract: Summary The aim of this study was to evaluate, by computer‐assisted analysis, the motility parameters of cryopreserved sea bream spermatozoa after prolonged storage (up to 5 years) in liquid nitrogen in comparison to the performances of fresh semen and of semen thawed 1 month after freezing (cryopreservation medium: 1% NaCl containing 5% DMSO; freezing rate: 10°C min−1; stored in liquid nitrogen). Semen samples were thawed 1 month and 5 years after cryopreservation. Sperm motility was analyzed by means of the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For preservation of sperm during a longer period, cryopreservation is the best option, and protocols developed in fish species can keep the sperm quality up to several years (Fabbrocini et al, 2015). Moreover, sperm cryopreservation presents many other applications in broodstock management, including the transport of gametes from different centers, or preservation of selected genetic lines (Asturiano et al, 2017;Cabrita et al, 2010;Martínez-Páramo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For preservation of sperm during a longer period, cryopreservation is the best option, and protocols developed in fish species can keep the sperm quality up to several years (Fabbrocini et al, 2015). Moreover, sperm cryopreservation presents many other applications in broodstock management, including the transport of gametes from different centers, or preservation of selected genetic lines (Asturiano et al, 2017;Cabrita et al, 2010;Martínez-Páramo et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%