1998
DOI: 10.3109/01485019808987947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spermatozoa Recovered by Ixaprep Gradient have Improved Longevity and Better Motion Characteristics than Those by Percoll Gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2003
2003

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
2
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Human spermatozoa are prone to ROS‐induced damage due to a higher level of polyunsaturated fatty acids in their membranes compared with somatic cells. The higher level of immotile and abnormal spermatozoa that we have found in IxaPrep‐separated spermatozoa could indicate a greater potential to generate ROS, though Yang et al . (1998 ) considered that ROS‐generating systems were possibly removed by IxaPrep separation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Human spermatozoa are prone to ROS‐induced damage due to a higher level of polyunsaturated fatty acids in their membranes compared with somatic cells. The higher level of immotile and abnormal spermatozoa that we have found in IxaPrep‐separated spermatozoa could indicate a greater potential to generate ROS, though Yang et al . (1998 ) considered that ROS‐generating systems were possibly removed by IxaPrep separation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…IxaPrep has been proposed as a substitute for Percoll for processing spermatozoa in human ART ( Yang et al ., 1998 ). We have compared the separation and the properties of spermatozoa from semen processed using both Percoll and IxaPrep.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While Claassens et al [61] and Söderlund and Lundin [62] did not find differences in the recovery rate between Percoll ® and PureSperm ® , Chen and Bongso [63], depending on the number of layers included for the density gradient, reported significantly higher values for PureSperm ® . For IxaPrep ® it is even more confusing because Yang et al [64] found no difference to Percoll ® , while Makkar et al [14] found the replacement substance more effective. On the other hand, McCann and Chantler [65] as well as Ding et al [66] found Percoll ® superior.…”
Section: Sperm Separation Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A Computer-Aided Sperm Analyzer (HTM-IVOS Version 10.6 CASA system; Hamilton Thorn Research, Danvers, MA, USA) was used to assess the following motion parameters in each sample [5,23]: straight-line velocity (VSL), curvilinear velocity (VCL), average path velocity (VAP), amplitude of lateral head displacement (ALH), beat cross frequency (BCF), straightness (STR), linearity (LIN), and percentage motility. The analysis conditions were 30 frames acquired; 60 Hz frame rate; minimum contrast of 80; minimum cell size of 3 pixels; straightness (STR) threshold of 80%; medium VAP cutoff of 25 mm=s; low VAP cutoff of 5 mm=s; low VSL cutoff of 11.0; nonmotile head size of 6 pixels; nonmotile head intensity of 160; static size limits of 1.0-2.90; static intensity limits of 0.60-1.40; static elongation limits of 0-80; slow motility was considered positive; 1.95 magnification; 2400 LED brightness; 37 C. At the outset of each assessment, the accuracy of the IVOS data was verified by utilizing the ''playback'' feature.…”
Section: Motility Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%