2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.fusengdes.2021.112331
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SPIDER Cs Ovens functional tests

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preparation of the caesium operation also included a thorough testing and qualification of the caesium ovens [37][38][39], necessary to validate the design and to quantify the evaporation rates, and also to define adequate loading procedures. Each of the three caesium ovens, fully contained inside the SPIDER vacuum vessel, was loaded with 10 g of caesium.…”
Section: Experimental Configuration Of Spider and Operation With Caesiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preparation of the caesium operation also included a thorough testing and qualification of the caesium ovens [37][38][39], necessary to validate the design and to quantify the evaporation rates, and also to define adequate loading procedures. Each of the three caesium ovens, fully contained inside the SPIDER vacuum vessel, was loaded with 10 g of caesium.…”
Section: Experimental Configuration Of Spider and Operation With Caesiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter results from the Hershkowitz approximation [22] for floating condition, which is only an indicative estimation, so that a large margin was taken with respect to the axial extent of the nozzle. The alternative solution of operating the oven at higher temperatures, so that transients during plasma on would have a minor impact, is not compatible with the present design [23]; oven operation during long pulses will have to be assessed in the future.…”
Section: Control Of Caesium Evaporation and Improvement Of The Emissi...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The source was mostly operated at 50 kW/driver; the features exhibited at low RF power were amplified or even exaggerated in this case, and so did the nonhomogeneity both in the beam and in the plasma properties at the extraction region. For instance, during the operation with standard filter field, the average ion beam current at the bottom half of the bottom segment was regularly lower than in the rest of the source; the line-averaged density of neutral cesium measured at the same location in front of PG and BP also showed a lower value, although the three cesium ovens, uniformly distributed along the vertical direction of the source, were operated with identical parameters [33], and their emission rates were confirmed to be very similar from Langmuir-Taylor detector estimations [34]. As already mentioned, visual inspection of the plasma source at the end of the operation confirmed that the bottom half of the bottom segment of both PG and BP was substantially cleaner than the other segments.…”
Section: Uniformity Inside the Ion Source And In The Beammentioning
confidence: 99%