2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.04.118
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spin canting effect and microwave absorption properties of Sm–Mn substituted nanosized material

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, the magnetization of HPFN continuously increased along with the increase in the applied magnetic eld at 3 K, which may have been due to the enhanced spin canting effect of Gd 3+ in HPFN. 30,31 In addition, the hysteresis at 3 K indicated that the nanonetworks possessed superparamagnetism. Standard zero-eld cooling (ZFC) and eld cooling (FC) measurements of HPFN displayed similar curves compared to those of paramagnetic Gd 2 O 3 at a low temperature, but gradually became similar to the curves of superparamagentic Fe 3 O 4 with an increase in temperature (Fig.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Hpfnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the magnetization of HPFN continuously increased along with the increase in the applied magnetic eld at 3 K, which may have been due to the enhanced spin canting effect of Gd 3+ in HPFN. 30,31 In addition, the hysteresis at 3 K indicated that the nanonetworks possessed superparamagnetism. Standard zero-eld cooling (ZFC) and eld cooling (FC) measurements of HPFN displayed similar curves compared to those of paramagnetic Gd 2 O 3 at a low temperature, but gradually became similar to the curves of superparamagentic Fe 3 O 4 with an increase in temperature (Fig.…”
Section: Synthesis and Characterization Of Hpfnmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their serial articles of "Sr 2 Ni 2 X" also show the X-ray diffraction figures with no fingerprint peaks of the X-type ferrite. [17][18][19][20] Hakimi described that the X-ray diffraction pattern of "Sr 2 CuMgFe 28 O 46 " did not conform to any of the patterns of the M-, W-, Y-, Z-, and U-type hexaferrites. 10 However, the diffraction pattern of (d) "Sr 2 CuMgX" is consistent with that of (e) SrM (SrFe 12 O 19 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For samples synthesized through the ultrasonication route, M max are in the ranges of 43.84-53. 36 and 73.30-83.03 emu/g at 300 and 10 K, respectively (Table 2). Nevertheless, it is obvious that an applied field of ±10 kOe is not enough to saturate the prepared samples.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, it has been reported that the larger content of rare earth ions gradually alters the magnetization from collinear spins to non-collinear spins of Fe 3+ ions, and hence decreases the magnetization [30,36]. Sadiq et al [36] claimed that the doping with RE elements could reduce the strength of super-exchange interactions among Fe 3+ -O-Fe 3+ , leading to spin-canting or non-collinear arrangement of magnetic moments. The decrease in magnetization could be also attributed to the formation of secondary phases of Fe 2 O 3 , as observed in the XRD investigation.…”
Section: Magnetic Investigationsmentioning
confidence: 99%