2019
DOI: 10.1007/s12253-019-00704-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinal Versus Intracranial Meningioma: Aberrant Expression of CD10 and Inhibin with Relation to Clinicopathological Features and Prognosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cancers 2024, 16, 1426 2 of 21 New literature is emerging, which suggests that spinal meningiomas may differ from their intracranial counterparts in a number of pertinent ways, including tissue lineage and clonality, molecular characterization and pathways pertinent to meningiomagenesis, risk of recurrence, the utility of surgical grading systems, and adjuvant treatment strategies [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9]. Nonetheless, regardless of location, ongoing challenges in meningioma research include the diagnostic integration of histopathology with molecular markers to accurately predict biological behavior, improvement in post-surgical neurological outcomes, and methods to decrease rates of recurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cancers 2024, 16, 1426 2 of 21 New literature is emerging, which suggests that spinal meningiomas may differ from their intracranial counterparts in a number of pertinent ways, including tissue lineage and clonality, molecular characterization and pathways pertinent to meningiomagenesis, risk of recurrence, the utility of surgical grading systems, and adjuvant treatment strategies [2,[4][5][6][7][8][9]. Nonetheless, regardless of location, ongoing challenges in meningioma research include the diagnostic integration of histopathology with molecular markers to accurately predict biological behavior, improvement in post-surgical neurological outcomes, and methods to decrease rates of recurrence.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%