2016
DOI: 10.1080/00766097.2016.1221264
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Spinning Yarns: The Archaeological Evidence for Hand Spinning and its Social Implications, cad1200–1500

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Items associated with ploughing from Building 1 at Hangleton suggest the seasonal aggregation of communities of practice. If we follow artistic depictions, spindle whorls mediated the social life of peer groups of women, who span as they socialised and watched their children play (see Standley, 2016). These groups, like houses, can be understood in terms of folds and flows, obligation, shared experiences and memory; the demands of the land and spatial proximity all worked to re-constitute them in accordance with varying temporal rhythms.…”
Section: Household Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Items associated with ploughing from Building 1 at Hangleton suggest the seasonal aggregation of communities of practice. If we follow artistic depictions, spindle whorls mediated the social life of peer groups of women, who span as they socialised and watched their children play (see Standley, 2016). These groups, like houses, can be understood in terms of folds and flows, obligation, shared experiences and memory; the demands of the land and spatial proximity all worked to re-constitute them in accordance with varying temporal rhythms.…”
Section: Household Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…27 Cf. Standley 2016, 284-285. The bulls of Innocent VI (1352-1362; John XXIII, found at Brompton on Swale (North Yorkshire); and Innocent IV (1243-54), found at Dunkeld, had been converted into spindle whorls.…”
Section: Other Archaeological Finds Of Bulls Of John XXIIImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gendered interpretations that explore LGBTQ+ perspectives are non-existent and very rare across archaeology more generally. While some publications do foreground ‘gender’—a malapropos for the study of women—these largely tell stories of women in the male world (Standley 2008, 2016; Hicks 2009; Richardson 2012; Wiekart 2014; Collins 2018). With few exceptions, this perceived disinterest in gender contrasts with early medieval, Anglo-Saxon and Viking studies, in which these subjects are explored to some extent (e.g.…”
Section: Gender and Medieval Archaeology In Britain And Irelandmentioning
confidence: 99%