Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd003425
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splenectomy versus conservative management for acute sequestration crises in people with sickle cell disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The crisis resolved only after splenectomy. While splenectomy may be indicated in SCA patients who develop splenic sequestration or hypersplenism, its role in the prevention or treatment of HS is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…The crisis resolved only after splenectomy. While splenectomy may be indicated in SCA patients who develop splenic sequestration or hypersplenism, its role in the prevention or treatment of HS is unknown.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…It is a severe event, either for the possible fatal consequences or for the risk of following recurrence. It is usually managed with splenectomy, a recognized treatment in transfusion‐dependent patients with thalassemia major, except for young patients who receive a chronic transfusion program . Although the number of patients enrolled does not allow us to compare our data to those reported in the literature for SS/β° patients, the events in our cohort are relevant, pointing to a not‐so mild clinical course.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…However, as there is a lack of evidence from the randomized control trials showing that splenectomy improves survival and decreases morbidity in patients with sickle cell disease, hence splenectomy was not considered. 7 …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%