2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2010.06.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Splitting tensile strength and modulus of elasticity of self-compacting concrete

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
42
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 131 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
5
42
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the mean relationship proposed by CEB-FIP model generally provided higher tensile strength value. This finding may be confirmed by the results of Parra et al (2011), reported that at more advanced ages (28 and 90 days), there is a clearly higher tensile strength in normal vibration concrete than in SCC for the same compressive strength.…”
Section: Hardened Concrete Results 621 Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…However, the mean relationship proposed by CEB-FIP model generally provided higher tensile strength value. This finding may be confirmed by the results of Parra et al (2011), reported that at more advanced ages (28 and 90 days), there is a clearly higher tensile strength in normal vibration concrete than in SCC for the same compressive strength.…”
Section: Hardened Concrete Results 621 Compressive Strengthsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…HPFGC proportioned with 20 % RHA had lower splitting tensile strength with respect to the control sample. It is well documented that splitting tensile strength is mainly governed by aggregate-paste bond (Nazari and Riahi 2011;Parra et al 2011). RHA incorporation refined the transition zone between cement matrix and aggregate, and reduced the amount of large calcium hydroxide crystals and ettringite due to additional C-S-H phases generated from pozzolanic reaction, as mentioned in the previous section.…”
Section: Splitting Tensile Strengthmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Most published articles acknowledged that for a selected compressive strength value, SCC could reach a tensile strength value which is slightly smaller than of NVC [14][15][16][17][18]. For instance, Parra et al [14] registered lower values of splitting tensile strength of SCC made with limestone powder (LP) filler than that of NVC, however, Felekoglu et al [17] showed that higher splitting tensile strength values were obtained in SCC rather than NVC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Parra et al [14] registered lower values of splitting tensile strength of SCC made with limestone powder (LP) filler than that of NVC, however, Felekoglu et al [17] showed that higher splitting tensile strength values were obtained in SCC rather than NVC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%