1968
DOI: 10.1136/pgmj.44.513.504
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

‘Spontaneous’ rupture of the healthy oesophagus

Abstract: Summary The clinical features of four cases of ‘spontaneous’ rupture of the oesophagus are described together with the radiological changes. It is emphasized that the diagnosis often may be made from simple penetrated views of the heart shadow with the patient in the erect position.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1969
1969
1979
1979

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The 'V' sign of Naclerio, a triangular lucency seen through the heart which has been associated with lower esophageal perforation, has been variously ascribed to emphysema in the triangular ligament, as well as to chemical mediastinitis [5,10]. In addition, pneumoperitoneum may be seen.…”
Section: Radiographic Manifestations Of Esophageal Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 'V' sign of Naclerio, a triangular lucency seen through the heart which has been associated with lower esophageal perforation, has been variously ascribed to emphysema in the triangular ligament, as well as to chemical mediastinitis [5,10]. In addition, pneumoperitoneum may be seen.…”
Section: Radiographic Manifestations Of Esophageal Injurymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to 1946 there had been no record of successful treatment (Barrett 1946) but since then there have been several (Barrett 1947, Borrie 1955); 90% of the cases occur in males (Borrie 1958) and the tear is said to occur nearly always in the relatively unsupported, lower third of the cesophagus (Mallory & Weiss 1929) on the left side (Mackler 1952). However, on reviewing a total of 15 cases described by various authors (Barrett 1946, 1947, Mackler 1952, Nanson & Walker 1953, Borrie 1958, Toghill et al 1968), the site of the rupture in 9 cases was on the left side and in 6 cases on the right side. This is a much higher incidence of right-sided rupture than was previously thought and although the numbers are small, this indicates the need for a full survey of the literature and for an awareness that right-sided rupture may be only slightly less common than left-sided rupture.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%