2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.peva.2012.08.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stability of flow-level scheduling with Markovian time-varying channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The fact that mobility may improve performance has already been observed in the literature (e.g., in [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]). These papers mainly present theoretical properties and performance bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…The fact that mobility may improve performance has already been observed in the literature (e.g., in [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]). These papers mainly present theoretical properties and performance bounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 65%
“…However, we believe that it is important first to understand this case, likely to be analytically the simplest, and future research should address the question of (in)sensitivity of our results to the job size distribution. Note also that the existing maximal stability results for best-condition schedulers [4,16] also rely on the geometric job size assumption. …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, they belong to the family of the best-condition schedulers, which give always priority to users currently in their best condition over users which are not, and which have important stability properties in Markovian setting as shown in [16].…”
Section: Proposed Schedulersmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A scheduling strategy which may seem efficient when users are static can lead to bad performance when users are mobile. This is a rather surprising result since mobility is generally thought as improving throughput performance, see for instance [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16]. We study the impact of mobility on the performance of CoMP under several scheduling strategies.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%