Stability of unilateral posterior crossbite correction in the mixed dentition: A randomized clinical trial with a 3-year follow-up

Petrén, Sofia; Bjerklin, Krister; Bondemark, Lars

doi:10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.06.018

Cited by 50 publications

(91 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Crossbite must be treated early to avoid negative long-term effects on the growth and development of facial teeth and bones (28) , in addition to being a risk factor for the development of TMD symptoms (11) . A study found higher frequency of crossbite in patients with disk displacement and increased overjet and decreased overbite in patients with osteoarthrosis (29) .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influência da hipermobilidade articular generalizada sobre a articulação temporomandibular e a oclusão dentária: estudo transversal

Chiodelli

Pacheco

Missau

et al. 2016

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

RESUMO Objetivo Avaliar a oclusão dentária e a articulação temporomandibular de mulheres com e sem hipermobilidade articular generalizada. Método A hipermobilidade foi avaliada pelo Escore de Beighton, e as voluntárias foram distribuídas, conforme o escore obtido, em dois grupos: com e sem hipermobilidade. A articulação temporomandibular foi avaliada por meio do instrumento Critérios de Diagnóstico para Pesquisa de Desordens Temporomandibulares, e a avaliação oclusal compreendeu a classificação de Angle, presença de sobremordida, sobressaliência e mordida cruzada, padrão de desoclusão e interferências oclusais. Resultados 43 mulheres participaram voluntariamente da pesquisa, 17 no grupo com hipermobilidade e 26 no grupo sem hipermobilidade. A frequência de ruídos articulares e de desvio na abertura da boca foi maior no grupo com hipermobilidade (52,9% versus 38,5% e 76,5% versus 50%, respectivamente), sem diferença significante. Quanto à oclusão, nenhuma voluntária apresentou uma oclusão ideal e não se verificou diferença significativa na Classe de Angle entre os grupos. As alterações na oclusão obtiveram percentual maior no grupo com hipermobilidade (29,4% de sobremordida, 47,1% de sobressaliência e 17,6% de mordida cruzada), sendo que a mordida cruzada apresentou diferença estatística entre os grupos. Conclusão A hipermobilidade não influenciou a oclusão e as amplitudes de movimentos mandibulares nas mulheres avaliadas. Contudo, o maior percentual de ruídos articulares e de desvio não corrigido apresentado pelo grupo com hipermobilidade, mesmo sem diferença entre os grupos, pode constituir um indício de relação entre hipermobilidade e disfunção temporomandibular.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influência da hipermobilidade articular generalizada sobre a articulação temporomandibular e a oclusão dentária: estudo transversal

Chiodelli

Pacheco

Missau

et al. 2016

CoDAS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The retention period after maxillary expansion ranged from five 22 to sixteen months, 16 and the appliances used were: fixed (acrylic plate expander, 22 Haas, 8 , 16 Hyrax 17 and quad-helix 4 , 21 ) or removable (hawley 4 , 22 and Hawley expander 4 , 21 , 22 ). …”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…No significant changes at the level of the pterigoid plates TG=CG Godoy et al4 (2011)Maxillary arch width: PSM-center of the fossa IC- cusp tip DC6m after appliance removalnoIMD: P<0.001 (QDH=EP; QDH≠ CG; EP≠ CG) ICD: P= 0.354 PSF QDH= 2.2% EP = 1.7% IC QDH = 0.3% EP = 0% yes 9.1% of the each sample showed relapseQDH=EP for correct posterior crossbite QDH> breakage EP> lost appliances QDH< treatment time Treatment may be performed in 1y for posterior CB correction and 6m for retention Petrén et al21 (2011)Maxillary arch width: PSM-gingival margin (GM) PSM-mesiobuccal cusp tip (MCT) IC-gingival margin (GM) IC-buccal cusp tip (BCT) DCQDH and EP group 4y after correctionnoIMD (MCT): P=NR (CG>QDH,EP) ICD (BCT): P=NR (CG>QDH)PSM QDH = 1.6% EP = 5.6% IC (GM) QDH = 4.9% EP = 5.6% IC (BCT) QDH = 1.2% EP = 0.6%yesThe long-term stability of crossbite correction in the mixed dentition is favorable. Results: QDH=EP Primozic et al22 (2013)Palatal surface area (mm²) 3D digital DC12 months later 18 months later 30 months lateryesSurface(mm²): P= NR NS (TG=CG)Palatal surface area (TG) = - 0.5%26.7% of the TG showed relapseTreatment of unilateral CB in the deciduous dentition also create conditions for normal occlusal and craniofacial development.…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Various methods have been suggested for correction and retention after treatment of posterior crossbite in growing patients: Haas, 8 , 13 - 16 Hyrax, 14 , 15 , 17 , 18 quad-helix appliance (QDH), 4 , 7 , 14 , 15 , 19 - 21 removable plates, 4 , 7 , 9 , 20 - 22 grinding 7 , 10 and edgewise fixed appliances 23 …”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Some authors recommend that the retention phase should last for 6 weeks, 19 while others advocate 6 4 , 21 or 8 months 8 . Thus, a systematic review of the literature was deemed appropriate.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Retention period after treatment of posterior crossbite with maxillary expansion: a systematic review

Costa

Galindo

Mattos

et al. 2017

Dental Press J. Orthod.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the duration of the retention period in growing patients undergoing maxillary expansion and its relation with posterior crossbite stability. METHODS: Search strategies were executed for electronic databases Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed and Scopus, which were completed on January 15, 2016. The inclusion criteria included randomized, prospective or retrospective controlled trials in growing subjects with posterior crossbite; treated with maxillary expanders; retention phase after expansion; post-retention phase of at least 6 months. The exclusion criteria were anterior crossbite, craniofacial anomalies, surgery or another orthodontic intervention; case reports; author’s opinions articles, thesis, literature reviews and systematic reviews. The risk of bias of selected articles was assessed with Cochrane risk of bias tool for RCTs and Downs and Black checklist for non-RCTs.RESULTS: A total of 156 titles/abstracts was retrieved, 44 full-texts were examined, and 6 articles were selected and assessed for their methodological quality. The retention period after maxillary expansion ranged between 4 weeks and 16 months. Fixed (acrylic plate, Haas, Hyrax and quad-helix) or removable (Hawley and Hawley expander) appliances were used for retention.CONCLUSIONS: Six months of retention with either fixed or removable appliances seem to be enough to avoid relapse or to guarantee minimal changes in a short-term follow-up.

show abstract

Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites

Agostino

Ugolini

Signori

et al. 2014

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Stability of unilateral posterior crossbite correction in the mixed dentition: A randomized clinical trial with a 3-year follow-up

Cited by 50 publications

References 21 publications

Influência da hipermobilidade articular generalizada sobre a articulação temporomandibular e a oclusão dentária: estudo transversal

Influência da hipermobilidade articular generalizada sobre a articulação temporomandibular e a oclusão dentária: estudo transversal

Retention period after treatment of posterior crossbite with maxillary expansion: a systematic review

Orthodontic treatment for posterior crossbites

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About