Stage-based interventions for smoking cessation

Greene, Natasha

doi:10.1002/14651858.cd004492.pub3

Cited by 41 publications

(50 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…These differences, however, provided us with an opportunity to explore outcomes according to stage. As reported by Cahill et al, 41 the added value of adapting interventions to a smoker's stage of change is tentative. In their recent review, those authors reported that the evidence does not support the restriction of interventions only to smokers perceived to be in the preparation and action stages.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

Effects of Physical Activity on Teen Smoking Cessation

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: To understand the influence of physical activity on teen smoking-cessation outcomes. METHODS: Teens (N = 233; 14–19 years of age) from West Virginia high schools who smoked >1 cigarette in the previous 30 days were included. High schools with >300 students were selected randomly and assigned to brief intervention (BI), Not on Tobacco (N-O-T) (a proven teen cessation program), or N-O-T plus a physical activity module (N-O-T+FIT). Quit rates were determined 3 and 6 months after baseline by using self-classified and 7-day point prevalence quit rates, and carbon monoxide validation was obtained at the 3-month follow-up evaluation. RESULTS: Trends for observed and imputed self-classified and 7-day point prevalence rates indicated that teens in the N-O-T+FIT group had significantly higher cessation rates compared with those in the N-O-T and BI groups. Effect sizes were large. Overall, girls quit more successfully with N-O-T compared with BI (relative risk [RR]: >∞) 3 months after baseline, and boys responded better to N-O-T+FIT than to BI (RR: 2–3) or to N-O-T (RR: 1–2). Youths in the N-O-T+FIT group, compared with those in the N-O-T group, had greater likelihood of cessation (RR: 1.48) at 6 months. The control group included an unusually large proportion of participants in the precontemplation stage at enrollment, but there were no significant differences in outcomes between BI and N-O-T (z = 0.94; P = .17) or N-O-T+FIT (z = 1.12; P = .13) participants in the precontemplation stage. CONCLUSIONS: Adding physical activity to N-O-T may enhance cessation success, particularly among boys.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 73%

Effects of Physical Activity on Teen Smoking Cessation

et al. 2011

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…B) In those smokers who are not interested in quitting, physicians must provide them with advice to quit at every follow up visit. One meta-analyses has concluded that the evidence does not support the restriction of quitting advice and encouragement only to those smokers perceived to be in the preparation and action stages [16]. The interventions in these patients should comply with the characteristics of Motivational Interviewing (MI) [17].…”

Section: Counseling For Smokers Who Have Recently Been Diagnosed As Hmentioning

confidence: 99%

Smoking cessation treatment for COPD smokers: the role of counselling

Jiménez-Ruíz¹,

Fagerström²

2015

Monaldi Arch Chest Dis

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Smoking cessation is the only therapeutic intervention that can prevent COPD smokers from the chronic progression of their disorder. The most important intervention for helping these smokers to quit is a combination of counseling plus pharmacological treatment. The characteristics of the counseling should be different depending if this intervention is offered to smokers with a previous diagnosis of COPD or if the intervention is offered to smokers who have been recently diagnoses with COPD. The counseling of patients who have been recently diagnosed should include: a) explanation of the direct relationship between smoking and COPD, b) encouraging these patients to quit and c) using of spirometry and measurements of CO as a motivational tools. The counseling of patients who have been previously diagnosed should include: a) encouragement to make a serious quit attempt, b) an intervention that increases motivation, self-efficacy and self-esteem, c) and the intervention should also control depression and be directed to weight gain control.

show abstract

“…Çalışma grubunda sigara bırakma konusunda karar almış daha hazır olan grup sunulan hizmete daha çok katılmıştır. Bu yönüyle bu bulgu sigara bırakmada kişinin kendisini hazır hissetmesi gerektiği, düşünme ve hareket evresinde olanların sigara bırakma başarılarının anlamlı olarak daha yüksek olduğu 14 …”

Section: Discussionunclassified

Koroner kalp hastalığı(KKH) riski olup Toplum Tabanlı Sigara Bırakma Merkezi’ne davet edilenlerin başvurusunu etkileyen etmenler

Pekel¹,

Günay²,

Soysal³

et al. 2015

Türkiye Halk Sağlığı Dergisi

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ÖzetAmaç: Bu çalışmada amaç, KKH riski olup Toplum Tabanlı Sigara Bırakma Merkezi'ne davet edilenlerin başvurusuna etki eden faktörlerin belirlenmesidir. Yöntem: Balçova'da yaşayan 30 yaş üzeri kişilerin KKH risk durumlarının belirlendiği ve buna yönelik girişimlerin planlandığı Balçova'nın Kalbi(BAK) projesi kapsamında 2008 yılında yapılan durum saptama çalışmasında belirlenen Framingham risk düzeylerine göre KKH riski orta ve yüksek düzeyde riski olup sigara içen kişiler (1390 kişi) veri tabanından seçilmiştir. Projede eğitimli yedi kişiden oluşan Toplum Sağlığı Destek Grubu (TSDG) hedef gruba ev ziyaretleri ya da telefonla ulaşarak projeye katılmaları için merkeze davet etmişlerdir. Sigara Bırakma Merkezi'nde tüm hizmetler ücretsiz olarak sunulmuştur. Araştırmanın bağımlı değişkeni, Sigara Bırakma Merkezi'ne başvuru durumudur. Bağımsız değişkenleri ise yaş, cinsiyet, öğrenim durumu, medeni durum, sosyal güvence durumu, düzenli sigara içmeye başlama yaşı, günlük içilen sigara sayısı, sigara bırakmayı deneme, sigara bırakmayı düşünme, sigara bırakma hizmeti almak istemedir. Bulgular: Hedef grup olan 1390 kişiden %49'una(681) evinde ulaşılmıştır. Sigara Bırakma Merkezi'ne davet edilip randevu alan 444 kişiden %68.2'si başvurmuş, randevu almadığı halde başvuran 28 kişi de izleme alınmışlardır(n=330). Hedef grubun başvurusunu yaş, cinsiyet, medeni durum, öğrenim durumu, sosyal güvence durumu anlamlı olarak etkilememektedir. Sigarayı bırakmayı düşünenlerde, daha önce bırakmayı deneyenlerde ve sigara bırakma hizmeti almak isteyenlerde merkeze başvuru anlamlı olarak daha yüksek bulunmuştur. Sonuç: Toplum tabanlı olarak çalışmaya başlayan, KKH riski orta ve üzerinde olan kişilerin davet edilerek, ücretsiz hizmet sunulan bir sigara bırakma merkezinde davete yanıt verme düşüktür. Sigara bırakmada, KKH riski olanlarda bile, bireyin bu konudaki isteği hizmete ulaşmada önemli bir etkendir.Anahtar Kelimeler: Sigarayı bırakma programı, koroner kalp hastalığı.The factors that affect registration at a community-based cigarette cessation center of persons at risk of coronary heart disease Abstract Objective: The aim was to evaluate the factors that affect attendance at a community based smoking cessation center by people who are at risk of coronary heart disease.

show abstract

Stage-based interventions for smoking cessation

Cited by 41 publications

References 27 publications

Effects of Physical Activity on Teen Smoking Cessation

Effects of Physical Activity on Teen Smoking Cessation

Smoking cessation treatment for COPD smokers: the role of counselling

Koroner kalp hastalığı(KKH) riski olup Toplum Tabanlı Sigara Bırakma Merkezi’ne davet edilenlerin başvurusunu etkileyen etmenler

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About