1995
DOI: 10.1016/0003-4975(95)00752-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Staging non—small cell lung cancer by whole-body positron emission tomographic imaging

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 297 publications
(120 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
4
115
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Valk et al [117], in a recently reported study concerning subsets of 76 and 99 patients, also noted that PET correctly changed the nodal stage as determined by CT in 18 staging evaluations (24%), increasing the stage in eight patients and decreasing it in 11, including one false-negative. PET changed the metastasis stage in 30 patients: previously unsuspected distant metastases were demonstrated in 11 patients while normal PET findings were obtained at distant sites of CT abnormalities in 19 patients (one false-negative).…”
Section: Fig 2 Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodule (Adenosquamous Cmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Valk et al [117], in a recently reported study concerning subsets of 76 and 99 patients, also noted that PET correctly changed the nodal stage as determined by CT in 18 staging evaluations (24%), increasing the stage in eight patients and decreasing it in 11, including one false-negative. PET changed the metastasis stage in 30 patients: previously unsuspected distant metastases were demonstrated in 11 patients while normal PET findings were obtained at distant sites of CT abnormalities in 19 patients (one false-negative).…”
Section: Fig 2 Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodule (Adenosquamous Cmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…These studies must be separated into two groups, Some investigators have used focal techniques and have concentrated on hilar and mediastinal lymph node staging, while others have used whole-body techniques and have evaluated extrathoracic (Table 2) [49,[110][111][112][113][114][115][116][117][118][119]. The reported sensitivity for lymph node staging in non-small cell lung cancer varies from 82% to 100% and the specificity from 73% to 100%.…”
Section: Fig 2 Malignant Solitary Pulmonary Nodule (Adenosquamous Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PET has been shown to correctly increase or decrease nodal staging as initially determined by CT in 21% of presurgical patients [66]. In a study of 50 patients where PET and CT findings were reported jointly, the sensitivity rose to 93%, specificity 97% and accuracy 96% in the detection of mediastinal nodal disease [63].…”
Section: Positron Emission Tomographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Animal experiments with human gastric cancer xenografts also showed that FDG uptake is correlated with the differentiation of the tumour (Yoshioka et al, 1994). PET has already established a role in the staging of other tumours such as lung cancer and colon cancer (Valk et al, 1995;Vitola et al, 1996;Delbeke et al, 1997;Guhlmann et al, 1997;Steinert et al, 1997). The current study was undertaken to investigate FDG-PET prospectively as a means of detecting metastatic disease in patients with oesophageal tumours and of comparing the reliability of diagnostic assessment of PET with CT, with the surgical and histological findings as a gold standard.…”
mentioning
confidence: 97%