2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00264-022-05493-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standalone cage versus anchored cage for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a comparative analysis of clinical and radiological outcomes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 27 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For one-level ACDF, the ZP cage contributes to the improvements in neurological function and cervical lordosis, similar to those of the ST cage but with lower risk of implant failure ( 1 , 10 , 11 ). However, the number of current clinical articles comparing multi-level ACDF using ZP with that using ST is rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For one-level ACDF, the ZP cage contributes to the improvements in neurological function and cervical lordosis, similar to those of the ST cage but with lower risk of implant failure ( 1 , 10 , 11 ). However, the number of current clinical articles comparing multi-level ACDF using ZP with that using ST is rare.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%