2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jasrep.2020.102554
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standardization of ceramic shape: A case study of Iron Age pottery from northeastern Taiwan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
0
10
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Serwatka & Riede, 2016;Shott & Trail, 2010). The bulk of archaeological applications of GMM have so far relied on landmark-based approaches (Cardillo, 2010;Okumura & Araujo, 2018), although a surge of recent studies is demonstrating the utility of whole-outline approaches using so-called elliptical Fourier analysis (EFA; Kuhl and Giardina, 1982) and cognate approaches (Fox, 2015;Lipo et al, 2016;Wang & Marwick, 2020). Many of these studies also address shape change trajectories and discuss classification issues in Palaeolithic stone tools (e.g.…”
Section: Landmark and Outline Approaches In Geometric Morphometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Serwatka & Riede, 2016;Shott & Trail, 2010). The bulk of archaeological applications of GMM have so far relied on landmark-based approaches (Cardillo, 2010;Okumura & Araujo, 2018), although a surge of recent studies is demonstrating the utility of whole-outline approaches using so-called elliptical Fourier analysis (EFA; Kuhl and Giardina, 1982) and cognate approaches (Fox, 2015;Lipo et al, 2016;Wang & Marwick, 2020). Many of these studies also address shape change trajectories and discuss classification issues in Palaeolithic stone tools (e.g.…”
Section: Landmark and Outline Approaches In Geometric Morphometricsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Coefficent of variation (CV) is used to assess relative differences in standardization (Bamforth and Finlay 2008; Buchanan et al 2012; Eerkens and Bettinger 2008; Jennings 2016; Shott 1986; Smith and De Witt 2016). For CV of GM PC scores, we follow Wang and Marwick (2020) by normalizing to 1–10 and testing for significant differences (Krishnamoorthy and Lee 2014) using the R package cvequality (Version 0.2.0; Marwick and Krishnamoorthy 2019). We use Mann-Whitney U tests to compare measurements and PC scores for the 3D and 2D GM analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…shape variables). As the PC values can be negative, before calculating CVs we normalized them using the min-max normalization function to a range between 1 and 10, following Wang and Marwick (2020). To compare the equality of CVs among the knapping techniques, we employed the modified signed-likelihood ratio (MSLR) test (Krishnamoorthy and Lee, 2014).…”
Section: Statistical Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%