2013
DOI: 10.1007/s10039-013-1963-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Standards in der Versorgung proximaler Femurfrakturen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 25 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In primary care, extramedullary implants such as the dynamic hip screw (DHS) are increasingly less important. In up to 20% of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, there is no osseous healing, and thus, the symptomatic nonunion is associated with significant limitations and pain for those patients affected [ 1 ]. Potential causes for nonunion development are usually related to improperly respected biomechanics, initial implant placement or implant selection, excessive remaining bony gaps in the fracture area or infection [ 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In primary care, extramedullary implants such as the dynamic hip screw (DHS) are increasingly less important. In up to 20% of trochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures, there is no osseous healing, and thus, the symptomatic nonunion is associated with significant limitations and pain for those patients affected [ 1 ]. Potential causes for nonunion development are usually related to improperly respected biomechanics, initial implant placement or implant selection, excessive remaining bony gaps in the fracture area or infection [ 2 , 3 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%