DOI: 10.11606/t.83.2006.tde-15012007-174556
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

"Staphylococcus aureus e Staphylococcus aureus meticilina resistentes (MRSA) em profissionais de saúde e as interfaces com as infecções nosocomiais"

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
1
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The present results show a higher prevalence of MRCoNS in the intensive care unit. Interestingly, Palos (2006) observed a higher prevalence of healthcare workers carrying MRSA in intensive care units, in agreement with the present study. The higher prevalence of MRCoNS in the intensive care unit observed in the present study might be related to the invasive procedures performed in this unit and the conditions of the patient when admitted to this ward.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The present results show a higher prevalence of MRCoNS in the intensive care unit. Interestingly, Palos (2006) observed a higher prevalence of healthcare workers carrying MRSA in intensive care units, in agreement with the present study. The higher prevalence of MRCoNS in the intensive care unit observed in the present study might be related to the invasive procedures performed in this unit and the conditions of the patient when admitted to this ward.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This microorganism stands out among both hospital and community infection causes. Despite the relevance of this bacteria as an etiological agent of nosocomial infections and the importance of health professionals as important disseminators of this microorganism, little research has been developed in Brazil in this regard (11) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is important to monitor these strains at the study location. A research that involved to medical and nursing teams at the ICU, medical clinic, surgical clinic, gynecology/obstetrics and surgical center of a health institution in Goiás evidenced a sensitivity rate of only 53.3% among isolated S. aureus strains (11) . Studies appoint that resistance against the glycopeptide vancomycin should preferably be determined through more sensitive techniques, such as the plate screening technique, the minimum inhibitory concentration determination test (Etest) or genotypic detection (19) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(414/888), resultados semelhantes aos encontrados por Palos (2006), que identificou 50% de positividade nas amostras. Smith et al (2003a), ao realizarem um estudo retrospectivo de 5.005 espécimes de cavidade bucal de pacientes, obtiveram uma positividade de 20,3% (1017/5005) para S. aureus, dos quais 4,9% (50/1017) foram resistentes à meticilina.…”
Section: Neste Estudo Tivemos Como Um Dos Objetivos Identificar a Preunclassified