2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.03.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Starches from different botanical sources I: Contribution of amylopectin fine structure to thermal properties and enzyme digestibility

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

30
235
4
10

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 361 publications
(279 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
30
235
4
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The child tuber starches showed significantly lower onset gelatinization temperatures and smaller enthalpy-changes (56.0-57.5 • C and 14.2-15.2 J/g for 2013 samples and 56.2-57.2 • C and 14.5-15.0 J/g for 2014 samples, respectively) than their counterpart mother tuber starches (57.0-59.4 • C and 14.6-15.7 J/g for 2013 samples and 57.6-58.3 • C and 15.3-15.9 J/g for 2014 samples, respectively). The onset gelatinization temperatures of the starches were negatively correlated (r = −0.78, p < 0.01) with the percentages of the short branch-chains (DP < 12, Table 2), consistent with that previously reported (Jane et al, 1999;Srichuwong, Sunati, Mishima, Isono, & Hisamatsu, 2005a). The enthalpy-change of starch gelatinization reflects the energy required to dissociate the double-helical crystalline structures of starch (Donovan, 1979).…”
Section: Starch Thermal Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The child tuber starches showed significantly lower onset gelatinization temperatures and smaller enthalpy-changes (56.0-57.5 • C and 14.2-15.2 J/g for 2013 samples and 56.2-57.2 • C and 14.5-15.0 J/g for 2014 samples, respectively) than their counterpart mother tuber starches (57.0-59.4 • C and 14.6-15.7 J/g for 2013 samples and 57.6-58.3 • C and 15.3-15.9 J/g for 2014 samples, respectively). The onset gelatinization temperatures of the starches were negatively correlated (r = −0.78, p < 0.01) with the percentages of the short branch-chains (DP < 12, Table 2), consistent with that previously reported (Jane et al, 1999;Srichuwong, Sunati, Mishima, Isono, & Hisamatsu, 2005a). The enthalpy-change of starch gelatinization reflects the energy required to dissociate the double-helical crystalline structures of starch (Donovan, 1979).…”
Section: Starch Thermal Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…According to Rickard, Asaoka and Blanshard (1991), for starches from non-cereal sources, the cassava starch is the most susceptible to α-amylase, and the potato starch, the most resistant. It is well known that cassava and sweet potato starches display an A-type X-ray diffraction pattern, whereas potato starch shows B-type pattern (COTTRELL et al, 1995;JANE et al, 1999;MCPHERSON;HOOVER, 2001;SRICHUWONG et al, 2005). We also found hydrolysis percentage was calculated in relation to the dry basis (db) starch weight by Equation 1:…”
Section: Enzymatic Hydrolysismentioning
confidence: 73%
“…Paste clarity may depend on how completely melted, and dispersed starch crystallites are. In earlier studies, significant correlations were found between swelling power and peak viscosity; peak time, and swelling power and solubility (Nuwamanya et al 2010), and swelling power and breakdown viscosity (Srichuwong et al 2005) of tuber and root starches. High negative correlation was also reported between pasting viscosities and solubility of sweetpotato starches (Waramboi et al 2011).…”
Section: Correlations Between Chemical and Pasting Properties Of Natimentioning
confidence: 91%