Start-Up Demonstration Tests Based on Run and Scan Statistics

Antzoulakos, Demetrios L.; Koutras, Markos V.; Rakitzis, Athanasios C.

doi:10.1080/00224065.2009.11917759

Cited by 25 publications

(23 citation statements)

References 12 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The optimization is carried out with respect to some constraints. Antzoulakos et al [1] pointed out such an optimization regarding the CSDF model. Gera [12] applied this procedure to the more general TSCSTFCF.…”

Section: Constrained Optimizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering 3 Antzoulakos et al [1] gave a closed-form expression for { } for the CSDF case:…”

Section: The Tscstfdf Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An example for an application has been mentioned by Antzoulakos et al [1] regarding a conference center that wishes to replace its old slide projectors with modern ones. The outcomes of a set of demonstration tests that are carried out on the new projectors are recorded.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Previous work in this direction has been carried out by Viveros and Balakrishnan [4], Smith and Griffith [7], Gera [12], and Antzoulakos et al [1]. Maximum likelihood (MLE) is applied to obtain interval estimation.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…According to the TSCSTFCF model, a unit is accepted if either a run of successes or a total number of successes are observed before either a total number of failure or a run of failures ( , , , and ), and vice versa for rejection. The CSDF model has been recently introduced by Antzoulakos et al [1] according to which a unit is accepted if a run of consecutive successes is obtained before the occurrence of two failures that are not sufficiently distant ( ) from each other. It is rejected if two failures that are not sufficiently distant from each other are met before a certain run of successes ( , ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

A Start-Up Demonstration Test Involving Distant Failures

Gera

2013

Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A new procedure for determining the acceptance or rejection of a system that undergoes a start-up demonstration set of tests is presented. It is a generalization of the recently introduced CSDF model (consecutive successes distant failures). According to the new total successes consecutive successes total failures distant failures (TSCSTFDF) procedure, a unit is accepted when either a total number of successful tests or a specified number of consecutive successes are observed before a total number of failures or the occurrence of near failures which are too close to each other. The practical advantage of this new procedure is the significant reduction in the expected number of required tests together with improved second-order statistics (standard deviation).

show abstract

Section: Constrained Optimizationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering 3 Antzoulakos et al [1] gave a closed-form expression for { } for the CSDF case:…”

Section: The Tscstfdf Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

A Start-Up Demonstration Test Involving Distant Failures

Gera

2013

Journal of Quality and Reliability Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Binary State Start‐Up Demonstration Tests

Griffith¹,

Smith²

2019

Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Start‐up demonstration tests are used to determine the acceptability of equipment. These have been employed in a variety of situations including, among others, power generation equipment, emergency power systems, and security systems. This article discusses the various types of binary state start‐up demonstration tests that have been discussed in the literature. The structure of the tests varies based on the pattern of total or consecutive start‐ups required for acceptance or rejection of the equipment being tested. The assumptions on the start‐ups also vary as to whether they are considered as independent and identically distributed Bernoulli trials or have a more complex dependence structure. Start‐up demonstrations tests that utilize multiple stages and inspectors are also discussed.

show abstract

Start‐up demonstration tests: models, methods and applications, with some unifications

Koutras

Milienos

2014

Appl Stoch Models Bus & Ind

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Start‐up demonstration tests were first discussed in the quality/reliability literature about three decades ago. Since then, many variations of these tests have been introduced, and the corresponding distributional characteristics and inferential methods have also been studied. All these developments, based on independent and identically distributed binary trials, have been further generalized to some other forms of trials such as Markov‐dependent trials, exchangeable trials and multistate trials. In this paper, we provide a comprehensive review of all these results and highlight some unifications of the results. We also describe a general estimation method and then present several numerical examples to illustrate some of the models and methods described here. Finally, a number of open issues in this area of research are pointed out. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

show abstract

Start-Up Demonstration Tests Based on Run and Scan Statistics

Cited by 25 publications

References 12 publications

A Start-Up Demonstration Test Involving Distant Failures

A Start-Up Demonstration Test Involving Distant Failures

Binary State Start‐Up Demonstration Tests

Start‐up demonstration tests: models, methods and applications, with some unifications

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About