1997
DOI: 10.1016/s0749-3797(18)30092-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

State Health Department and University Evaluation of North Carolina’s Maternal Outreach Worker Program

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
30
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This research was undertaken as part of a comprehensive longitudinal evaluation of the MOW program ( Tessaro et al, 1997). This phase of the program's evaluation was conducted in two steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research was undertaken as part of a comprehensive longitudinal evaluation of the MOW program ( Tessaro et al, 1997). This phase of the program's evaluation was conducted in two steps.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…L ay health advisor (LHA) interventions are commonly used to address a wide variety of public health issues, often in traditionally underserved communities (Beam & Tessaro, 1994; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1994;Earp & Flax, 1999;Eng, 1993;Sharp et al, 1998;Tessaro et al, 1997;Watkins et al, 1994). This approach involves the identification and recruitment of individuals indigenous to a community who serve natural helping roles in their social networks.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eleven of the studies (39%) reported on prenatal care utilization, including one report that analyzed African American and White women separately (Table 2). Utilization was reported as prenatal care adequacy, using the Kotelchuck (Baldwin et al, 1998; Sangalang et al, 2006) or Kessler (Keeton et al, 2004; Rogers et al, 1996; Tessaro et al, 1997) indices, or as an absolute number of prenatal care visits given the trimester began prenatal care. Significant differences between the percent of the home‐visiting and non‐home‐visiting groups who received adequate prenatal care ranged from less than 1% (Hardy et al, 1987) to 4.5% (Keeton et al).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the 28 studies, 26 (93%) reported on the association between home visiting and a neonatal outcome (Table 3). Twenty‐four reports evaluated birth weight as an outcome, including one study that analyzed findings for African American and White women separately (Tessaro et al, 1997). Seven (28%) found a significant increase in birth weight for women who received prenatal home visiting compared to those who did not, including only three of the 12 RCTs (Brooten et al, 2001; Lee et al, 2009; Norbeck et al, 1996).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%