2013
DOI: 10.1121/1.4805772
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of community response to low amplitude sonic boom noise

Abstract: The Waveform and Sonicboom Perception and Response (WSPR) Program conducted a field study of subjective response to noise from multiple low-amplitude sonic booms. The team was led by Wyle and included researchers from Penn State, Tetra Tech and Gulfstream Aerospace Corp. The test exposed residents in the Edwards Air Force Base (EAFB) Housing area to two weeks of low-amplitude sonic booms while recording their responses via surveys. There were 52 participants divided across three response modes. The response in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The requirements and techniques used to meet these objectives are discussed in the aforementioned studies. 2,3 Another project objective of WSPR was to expose a residential community with at least 100 volunteer human response subjects to low booms, which are sonic booms similar to those predicted to be produced by next-generation commercial supersonic aircraft. Ideally, the human response subjects would be uniformly spread across the community, occupying various but known types of housing structures.…”
Section: B Project Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The requirements and techniques used to meet these objectives are discussed in the aforementioned studies. 2,3 Another project objective of WSPR was to expose a residential community with at least 100 volunteer human response subjects to low booms, which are sonic booms similar to those predicted to be produced by next-generation commercial supersonic aircraft. Ideally, the human response subjects would be uniformly spread across the community, occupying various but known types of housing structures.…”
Section: B Project Objectivesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowing the types of homes the subjects lived in is valuable since sonic booms have different effects on different structures. 5 Being able to coordinate closely with EAFB allowed us to know the exact housing types within the area. All homes were stucco construction, and housing types consisted of duplex units and single-family detached homes.…”
Section: Human Response Subject Outreach and Recruitmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This error pertains to the difference between true and indicated Mach, and 0.045 Mach can result in up to 1.7 nm error in low boom sonic boom location. 5 Since several F-18 aircraft were used during WSPR, the airdata calibration for each aircraft needed verification. Three aircraft (F-18A-843, F-18B-846, and F-18A-850) recently had undergone modification, the installation of a Traffic Collision Avoidance System (TCAS) antenna.…”
Section: Aircraft Air Data Calibrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This paper focuses on NASA's role in the project on essential elements of community response testing including human response subject recruitment, the operational processes involved in implementing the surveys throughout the community, instrumentation systems, flight planning, and operations. Actual sonic boom human response results, 5 survey methodology conclusions, 6 and sonic boom analysis 7 are presented separately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%