2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2013.05.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical analysis of pedestrian perceptions of sidewalk level of service in the presence of bicycles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
46
2
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 67 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
46
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, [149,[158][159][160][161] defined LOS based on qualitative approach using factors such as continuity, surface, safety, obstruction, gender, age, effective width, pedestrian and vehicle volume. The correlation was established between different attributes and satisfaction levels to describe the LOS.…”
Section: Sidewalk Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Recently, [149,[158][159][160][161] defined LOS based on qualitative approach using factors such as continuity, surface, safety, obstruction, gender, age, effective width, pedestrian and vehicle volume. The correlation was established between different attributes and satisfaction levels to describe the LOS.…”
Section: Sidewalk Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Malaysian commercial areas, [158] conducted a qualitative survey to understand the LOS of the facilities and it could be seen that safety and sidewalk conditions were the major factors which affected pedestrian perception. In a study in China, [159] observed that flow rate was the predominant factor which influenced the perception of the pedestrians. In Malaysia, [161], tried to analyse the satisfaction level of pedestrians based on gender and it could be seen that female pedestrians gave an overall lower satisfaction value in comparison to the male pedestrians.…”
Section: Sidewalk Facilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Satisfaction Evaluation [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] Assessment Evaluation [15][16][17][18] Pedestrian Level of Service [3,4,19,20] Measurement Evaluation [21][22][23] Pedestrian Index [24,25] Focus Group [26,27] Examining Evaluation [28] The elements that were commonly evaluated in previous research are pedestrian, walkability, and pedestrian environment [16]. The elements of pedestrian and walkability are the most dominant ones used in various studies because research in this field is more prevalent in cities in developed countries that have an acceptable quality of pedestrian environments.…”
Section: Techniques For Evaluation Authormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LOS is used as a standard for the planners to design to, and a suitable LOS and user perception is key to the successful implementation of the design. Pedestrian LOS have been discussed since around 1983 by A. Polus [3], but is still a hot topic of discussion [4,5,6,7,8]. Discussion about the LOS for pedestrian path starts with the flow, speed characteristics, and sidewalk capacity, and continues with pedestrian facilities, and then pedestrian perception.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other studies discuss pedestrian perception for the LOS [5,6], and mention that having a good understanding of the pedestrian perception of LOS on a pedestrian path in an urban area can be useful in developing strategies for providing a comfortable and safe walking environment [5]. Kang et al [5] concludes that the most influence factor on LOS value is pedestrian flow rates, however, many other factors have a significant influence on LOS perception, including sidewalk width, the presence of a barrier separating the sidewalk from motor-vehicle traffic, the presence of parking next to the sidewalk, and so on.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%