2021
DOI: 10.5194/egusphere-egu21-1326
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical and machine learning methods for postprocessing ensemble forecasts of wind gusts

Abstract: <p>We conduct a systematic and comprehensive comparison of state-of-the-art postprocessing methods for ensemble forecasts of wind gusts. The compared approaches range from well-established techniques to novel neural network-based methods. Our study is based on a 6-year dataset of forecasts from the convection‐permitting COSMO‐DE ensemble prediction system, with hourly lead times up to 21 hours and forecasts of 57 meteorological variables, and corresponding observations… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 58 publications
(109 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Different EMOS extensions can include more predictors, in particular the boosting extension (Messner et al, 2017). Schulz and Lerch (2021) compare a gradient boosting extension of EMOS (EMOS-GB) to many machine learning methods for postprocessing ensemble forecasts of wind gusts, using a truncated logistic distribution. The performances of EMOS-GB and other machine-learning-based postprocessing methods are promising.…”
Section: Comparison Of Performances Between Qrf and Emos Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different EMOS extensions can include more predictors, in particular the boosting extension (Messner et al, 2017). Schulz and Lerch (2021) compare a gradient boosting extension of EMOS (EMOS-GB) to many machine learning methods for postprocessing ensemble forecasts of wind gusts, using a truncated logistic distribution. The performances of EMOS-GB and other machine-learning-based postprocessing methods are promising.…”
Section: Comparison Of Performances Between Qrf and Emos Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%