2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2021.123000
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical assessment of operational parameters using optimized sulphonated titanium nanotubes incorporated sulphonated polystyrene ethylene butylene polystyrene nanocomposite membrane for efficient electricity generation in microbial fuel cell

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite all these advantages, Nafion ® membranes present some limitations i.e., ionconductivity drops rapidly in anhydrous conditions (RH < 80%) restricting the temperature to that not exceeding the boiling point of water and Nafion ® is an expensive material priced at about 500–700$ per m 2 [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. So over the last few years, many alternative polymeric materials for PEM have been proposed which include sulfonated polyether ether ketone (sPEEK) [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], sulfonated polysulfone (sPSU) [ 12 , 13 ], sulfonated polyether sulfone (sPES) [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], polybenzimidazole (PBI) [ 17 , 18 , 19 ] and sulfonated polystyrene (sPS) [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. In addition, many research groups have prepared composite PEMs using organic and inorganic fillers like TiO 2 , ZrO 2 , ZrP, BPO 4 , graphene oxide (GO), and SiO 2 to enhance the properties of proton exchange membranes [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite all these advantages, Nafion ® membranes present some limitations i.e., ionconductivity drops rapidly in anhydrous conditions (RH < 80%) restricting the temperature to that not exceeding the boiling point of water and Nafion ® is an expensive material priced at about 500–700$ per m 2 [ 6 , 7 , 8 ]. So over the last few years, many alternative polymeric materials for PEM have been proposed which include sulfonated polyether ether ketone (sPEEK) [ 9 , 10 , 11 ], sulfonated polysulfone (sPSU) [ 12 , 13 ], sulfonated polyether sulfone (sPES) [ 14 , 15 , 16 ], polybenzimidazole (PBI) [ 17 , 18 , 19 ] and sulfonated polystyrene (sPS) [ 20 , 21 , 22 ]. In addition, many research groups have prepared composite PEMs using organic and inorganic fillers like TiO 2 , ZrO 2 , ZrP, BPO 4 , graphene oxide (GO), and SiO 2 to enhance the properties of proton exchange membranes [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results were interesting, as they indicated that the rGOHI-AcOH-based catalysts, as mentioned earlier, could feasibly drive the MFC system without interruption (in terms of power density). The power output found in [116] was 76.6% higher than the maximum power output (138 mW/m 2 ) reported in a tubular MFC (T-MFC) [117]. The T-MFC was fabricated using a graphite rod as an anode electrode, carbon cloth-coated Pt (200 cm 2 ) as a cathode electrode, and nanocomposite as a proton exchange membrane.…”
Section: Bioelectricity Productionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…CM with sulphonic acid groups in the polymers displays improved ion transfer between electrodes. [70] This has led to the development of several PEM polymers with sulphonic acid groups such as Sulphonated Poly Ether Etherone, [68] Sulfonated Poly Styrene Ethylene Butylene Polystyrene, [71] Si-SPEEK, [72] sulfonated polysulfone (SPSF )73] , SPVC)/PAMPS, [74] Sulphonated polysilsesquioxanepolyimide [75] etc. As evident in this section, few studies are available discussing the fabrication and use of polymer-polymer composites for MFC.…”
Section: Polymer-polymer Composite Membranesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides the established advantage of its anti-biofouling nature in a membrane, Titanium in its sulphonated nanotubes version is hollow in structure enabling better water holding potential, facilitating Grotthus mechanism (by water molecules) and hopping mechanism (ion exchange group) for proton conductivity. [82] In another study using sulphonated TiO 2 nanotube (S-TNTs) with a polymer, Sugumar and Dharmalingam [71] fabricated Sulphonated Polystyrene Ethylene Butylene Polystyrene (SPSEBS) blended with different amounts of S-TNTs in composite membranes. The authors reported that SPSEBS + 6 % S-TNT displayed the highest proton conductivity, ion exchange capacity, water uptake, and a maximum power density of 138 mW/m 2 , suggesting better suitability for fuel cell performance.…”
Section: Metal/metal Oxide-polymer Compositesmentioning
confidence: 99%