1984
DOI: 10.1086/451444
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistical Determinants of the Population of a Nation's Largest City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of urban primacy in developing countries have found that a country's largest city is larger if it is the capital, holding a variety of country-level economic, institutional, and infrastructure variables constant (Ades and Glaeser 1995;De Cola 1984;Henderson 2002;Moomaw and Shatter 1996). Furthermore, Ades and Glaeser (1995, pp.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence For Enhanced Growth In Capital Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of urban primacy in developing countries have found that a country's largest city is larger if it is the capital, holding a variety of country-level economic, institutional, and infrastructure variables constant (Ades and Glaeser 1995;De Cola 1984;Henderson 2002;Moomaw and Shatter 1996). Furthermore, Ades and Glaeser (1995, pp.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence For Enhanced Growth In Capital Citiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Williamson (1965), Kamerschen (1969), El-Shaks (1972), Whiton and Shishido (1981) and DeCola (1984) find evidence for the inverted U-curve between urban concentration and economic development. Kamerschen (1969) uses data for 80 countries and the share of the largest city in percent of the four largest cities as a measure of concentration.…”
Section: Empirical Evidence For the Inverted U-curvementioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition to trade policies, institutional perspectives have prompted some to suggest that moving a capital city would disrupt primacy (De Cola 1984;Moomaw and Alwosabi 2004;Mutlu 1989;Rossman 2018). Of the few studies that looked at this, the results were mixed.…”
Section: Primacy Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%