Statistical variability of the geochemistry and mineralogy of soils in the Maritime Provinces of Canada and part of the Northeast United States

Abstract

A soil geochemical survey in the Maritime Provinces of Canada and part of the Northeast United States was completed for the North American Soil Geochemistry Landscapes Project. Soil samples, derived largely from unsorted glacial till, were collected over 349 sites, from 0 to 5 cm depth (regardless of horizon), A-, and C-horizons. The 0 to 5 cm depth interval represents the soil of interest in health risk assessments and is termed the Public Health (PH-) layer. The <2 mm fraction of each sample was analysed for a broad suite of major and trace elements using a near-total four-acid digestion, and major mineralogical components were determined by quantitative X-ray diffraction. Multivariate statistical analyses of the logcentred soil geochemistry from the PH-layer and the two soil horizons, and of the soil mineralogy from the A- and C-horizons, reveal distinctive inter-element relationships from deeper soil (represented by the C-horizon) upwards into topsoil (represented by the A-horizon and PH-layer). Statistical dispersion of several elements increases upwards in the soil profile. Maximum data dispersion occurs in the PH-layer and A-horizon soils. Elements including S, P, Pb, Hg, Cd, Se, Mo, Sb, Bi and Sn are relatively enriched in the PH-layer and A-horizon, and are positively correlated with increasing organic carbon contents. The relative enrichment of groups of elements in the C-horizon, in contrast to those elements in the A-horizon and PH-layer, suggests a composition that reflects the geochemistry of the glacial till that is derived from the local bedrock. Elements such as Ni, Mg, Cr, V, Co, Fe and Sc, represent a mafic component of the parent material, and relative enrichments of K, Rb, Zr, rare-earth elements, Li and Al indicate a more felsic component. The patterns revealed by the application of multivariate methods to the soil chemistry and mineralogy are attributed to underlying geology, soil-forming processes, and anthropogenic activity, or combinations of all three factors. Both the soil geochemistry and mineralogy were tested in their ability to predict soil horizon and underlying bedrock lithology or time-stratigraphic assemblages. The geochemistry and mineralogy of the soils are both good for predicting soil horizon; however, the soil geochemistry is better for predicting the underlying lithologies/assemblages than the soil mineralogy.

Reviving prospects for lake restoration - investigating the geochemistry of lake Alūksne sediments

“…Lakes carry the history of natural and anthropogenic impact in previous times. Physical and chemical data that is gained from lake sediments or soils in coastal neighbourhood can tell a lot, e.g., identifying deposition and erosion processes as well as underlying lithologies (Anselmetti et al, 2004;Beres et al, 2006;Drew et al, 2010;Grunsky et al, 2010Grunsky et al, , 2013Grunsky et al, , 2014. Geochemical data includes plethora of exploration, visualisation and meta-analysis of gained information .…”

“…Geochemical data includes plethora of exploration, visualisation and meta-analysis of gained information . Inorganic and organic substances play a huge role in determining the environmental quality and interactions in ecosystems of water bodies (Burlakovs, 2008;Grunsky et al, 2012Grunsky et al, , 2013.…”

Influence of the Laurentide Ice Sheet and relative sea‐level changes on sediment dynamics in the Estuary and Gulf of St. Lawrence since the last deglaciation

“…Young ; Grunsky et al . ). This method permits the semi‐quantification of whole‐sediment mineralogy with a precision of 5–10% for phyllosilicate and 5% for non‐phyllosilicate minerals.…”

Does Dust from Arctic Mines Affect Caribou Forage?

“…The top 0 to 5 cm of soil is considered the layer most affected by airborne contaminants such as dust, and thus is the layer of most interest for both human and wildlife health risk assessments [21]. We collected a 50 to 100 g soil sample from the top 5 cm of the soil layer, and near the dominant plant species at the site, which was usually dwarf birch.…”