Stephens' Detection and Evaluation of Adverse Drug Reactions 2011
DOI: 10.1002/9780470975053.ch6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Statistics: Analysis and Presentation of Safety Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…TTO SD may be useful as a complementary tool to DPA SD for four reasons: TTO SD is designed to detect any kind of difference in the distribution (e.g., differences in central tendency, dispersion, or skewness), whereas DPA are designed to detect only unexpected numbers of events. TTO SD is not affected by the “masking effect”. This problem occurs frequently with DPA methods if a particular V–E pair is massively reported: it inflates the overall reporting rates for both the vaccine and the event, sometimes to the extent that excessive reporting rates for the same vaccine with another event or for another vaccine with the same event are masked TTO SD is expected to be less sensitive to reporting biases than DPA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TTO SD may be useful as a complementary tool to DPA SD for four reasons: TTO SD is designed to detect any kind of difference in the distribution (e.g., differences in central tendency, dispersion, or skewness), whereas DPA are designed to detect only unexpected numbers of events. TTO SD is not affected by the “masking effect”. This problem occurs frequently with DPA methods if a particular V–E pair is massively reported: it inflates the overall reporting rates for both the vaccine and the event, sometimes to the extent that excessive reporting rates for the same vaccine with another event or for another vaccine with the same event are masked TTO SD is expected to be less sensitive to reporting biases than DPA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated a ROR to compare risk of exposure to different drugs in cases and noncases previously described. The RORs are given with their 95% CIs . The 95% CIs were calculated using the Woolf's method .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated an ADR ROR in order to compare the risk of exposure to the different classes of drugs in ‘cases’ and ‘noncases’. RORs were given with their 95% CI as crude RORs [15].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%