2009
DOI: 10.1080/01614940903048612
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Steady‐State and Dynamic Reactor Models for Hydrotreatment of Oil Fractions: A Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
70
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 193 publications
1
70
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…where n 1 = 1.8, n 2 = 0.96 and K S H 2 S ¼ 5:1668e 4:092 T and T is in Kelvin. k app was correlated with k in as follows:…”
Section: Fifth Approach Reported In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…where n 1 = 1.8, n 2 = 0.96 and K S H 2 S ¼ 5:1668e 4:092 T and T is in Kelvin. k app was correlated with k in as follows:…”
Section: Fifth Approach Reported In the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also reports over the most common approaches to simulate the tricklebed reactor in which HDS is carried out have been summarized [4]. However it has been recognized that even when the vast literature reproduces reasonable well particular HDS process it is difficult to compare among several approaches the best reactor and kinetic model for the same process due to the incomplete experimental data [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The tortuosity factor ( ) of the pore network is used in the calculation of because the pores are not oriented along the normal direction from the surface to the center of the catalyst particle 35 , which is:…”
Section: Models Based On Kineticsmentioning
confidence: 99%