2016
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Stellar twins determine the distance of the Pleiades

Abstract: Since the release of the Hipparcos catalog in 1997, the distance to the Pleiades open cluster has been heavily debated. The distance obtained from Hipparcos and those by alternative methods differ by 10 to 15%. As accurate stellar distances are key to understanding stellar structure and evolution, this dilemma puts the validity of stellar evolution models into question. Using our model-independent method to determine parallaxes based on twin stars, we report individual parallaxes of 15 FGK type stars in the Pl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The method of double stars orbital modeling led to cluster's distance value of 138.0±1.5 pc (Groenewegen et al 2007). Recently, the twin stars method yielded the distance of 134.8 ± 1.7 pc to the Pleiades open cluster ( Mädler et al 2016). As can be noticed, majority of the distance estimates provide similar results, close to ∼135 pc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The method of double stars orbital modeling led to cluster's distance value of 138.0±1.5 pc (Groenewegen et al 2007). Recently, the twin stars method yielded the distance of 134.8 ± 1.7 pc to the Pleiades open cluster ( Mädler et al 2016). As can be noticed, majority of the distance estimates provide similar results, close to ∼135 pc.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Yet the Hipparcos parallaxes were not without problems, perhaps the most significant of which was the aberrant distance to the Pleiades which the Hipparcos parallax placed at 120.2 ± 1.9 pc (van Leeuwen 2009) as compared to the broadly accepted distance of ≈135 pc from a variety of methods (e.g., Munari et al 2004;Zwahlen et al 2004;Soderblom et al 2005;Groenewegen et al 2007;Melis et al 2014;Mädler et al 2016, and others cited therein). Several of these recent determinations are formally highly precise (σ = 1.2-1.7 pc).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the exquisite precision and accuracy of the Gaia data, the agreement between our derived values and the literature values are good. The adopted average distances for the Pleiades (Mädler et al 2016), α Per (van Leeuwen 2009), Hyades (van Leeuwen 2007) and LCC (de Zeeuw et al 1999) are 135 pc, 172 pc, 47 and 118 pc, respectively. In lower right panel, we show the mass distributions of the four groups, which all share a similar slope.…”
Section: Comparing To Nearby Cluster and Moving Group Membersmentioning
confidence: 99%